GHSA-FXC7-FM93-6Q77

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 22:22 – Updated: 2026-05-13 16:28
VLAI
Summary
ArcadeDB vulnerable to cross-database authorization bypass and unsecured newly-created databases
Details

Impact

Authenticated users and API tokens scoped to a specific database could read, write, and mutate schema on any other database on the same server. Two distinct defects contributed: (1) ServerSecurityUser.getDatabaseUser() returned a DB user with an uninitialized fileAccessMap, which requestAccessOnFile treated as allow-all; (2) ArcadeDBServer.createDatabase() omitted factory.setSecurity(...) so any database created via POST /api/v1/server {"command":"create database X"} had its entire record-level authorization system silently disabled. In combination, record-level and database-level authorization could be bypassed by any authenticated principal.

Patches

Upgrade to version 26.4.2

Resources

https://github.com/ArcadeData/arcadedb/commit/04110c06315da55604ac107f71fe7182f3a3deb8

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.arcadedb:arcadedb-server"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "26.4.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44221"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T22:22:22Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-12T20:16:43Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nAuthenticated users and API tokens scoped to a specific database could read, write, and mutate schema on any other database on the same server. Two distinct defects contributed: (1) ServerSecurityUser.getDatabaseUser() returned a DB user with an uninitialized fileAccessMap, which requestAccessOnFile treated as allow-all; (2) ArcadeDBServer.createDatabase() omitted factory.setSecurity(...) so any database created via POST /api/v1/server {\"command\":\"create database X\"} had its entire record-level authorization system silently disabled. In combination, record-level and database-level authorization could be bypassed by any authenticated principal.\n\n### Patches\nUpgrade to version 26.4.2\n\n### Resources\n\nhttps://github.com/ArcadeData/arcadedb/commit/04110c06315da55604ac107f71fe7182f3a3deb8",
  "id": "GHSA-fxc7-fm93-6q77",
  "modified": "2026-05-13T16:28:38Z",
  "published": "2026-05-05T22:22:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ArcadeData/arcadedb/security/advisories/GHSA-fxc7-fm93-6q77"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44221"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ArcadeData/arcadedb/commit/04110c06315da55604ac107f71fe7182f3a3deb8"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ArcadeData/arcadedb"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "ArcadeDB vulnerable to cross-database authorization bypass and unsecured newly-created databases"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…