GHSA-FV86-V5JC-CRCG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-10 15:30 – Updated: 2024-10-10 15:30
VLAI?
Details

In btcd before 0.24.2, removeOpcodeByData mishandles the consensus rules for legacy signature verification. There can be a standard transaction that would be considered valid by Bitcoin Core but invalid by btcd.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-36051"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-10T13:15:14Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In btcd before 0.24.2, removeOpcodeByData mishandles the consensus rules for legacy signature verification. There can be a standard transaction that would be considered valid by Bitcoin Core but invalid by btcd.",
  "id": "GHSA-fv86-v5jc-crcg",
  "modified": "2024-10-10T15:30:41Z",
  "published": "2024-10-10T15:30:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36051"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/cve-2024-38365-public-disclosure-btcd-findanddelete-bug/1184"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/releases/tag/v0.24.2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…