GHSA-FR76-MW78-4MFW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:27 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:27
VLAI?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the Certificate Trust List (CTL) Provider service (CTLProvider.exe) in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 4.2 before 4.2(3)SR3 and 4.3 before 4.3(1)SR1, and CallManager 4.0 and 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR5c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via a long request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-0027"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-01-17T03:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the Certificate Trust List (CTL) Provider service (CTLProvider.exe) in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 4.2 before 4.2(3)SR3 and 4.3 before 4.3(1)SR1, and CallManager 4.0 and 4.1 before 4.1(3)SR5c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via a long request.",
"id": "GHSA-fr76-mw78-4mfw",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:27:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:27:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-0027"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/39704"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/advisory/TPTI-08-02"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28530"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3551"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080932c61.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/486432/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27313"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019223"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0171"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…