GHSA-FQP7-97QM-6GWM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-18 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-13 21:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

skmsg: Fix wrong last sg check in sk_msg_recvmsg()

Fix one kernel NULL pointer dereference as below:

[ 224.462334] Call Trace: [ 224.462394] __tcp_bpf_recvmsg+0xd3/0x380 [ 224.462441] ? sock_has_perm+0x78/0xa0 [ 224.462463] tcp_bpf_recvmsg+0x12e/0x220 [ 224.462494] inet_recvmsg+0x5b/0xd0 [ 224.462534] __sys_recvfrom+0xc8/0x130 [ 224.462574] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x1df/0x2e0 [ 224.462606] ? __do_page_fault+0x2de/0x500 [ 224.462635] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x24/0x30 [ 224.462660] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x1d0 [ 224.462709] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca

In commit 9974d37ea75f ("skmsg: Fix invalid last sg check in sk_msg_recvmsg()"), we change last sg check to sg_is_last(), but in sockmap redirection case (without stream_parser/stream_verdict/ skb_verdict), we did not mark the end of the scatterlist. Check the sk_msg_alloc, sk_msg_page_add, and bpf_msg_push_data functions, they all do not mark the end of sg. They are expected to use sg.end for end judgment. So the judgment of '(i != msg_rx->sg.end)' is added back here.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-49973"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-06-18T11:15:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nskmsg: Fix wrong last sg check in sk_msg_recvmsg()\n\nFix one kernel NULL pointer dereference as below:\n\n[  224.462334] Call Trace:\n[  224.462394]  __tcp_bpf_recvmsg+0xd3/0x380\n[  224.462441]  ? sock_has_perm+0x78/0xa0\n[  224.462463]  tcp_bpf_recvmsg+0x12e/0x220\n[  224.462494]  inet_recvmsg+0x5b/0xd0\n[  224.462534]  __sys_recvfrom+0xc8/0x130\n[  224.462574]  ? syscall_trace_enter+0x1df/0x2e0\n[  224.462606]  ? __do_page_fault+0x2de/0x500\n[  224.462635]  __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x24/0x30\n[  224.462660]  do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x1d0\n[  224.462709]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca\n\nIn commit 9974d37ea75f (\"skmsg: Fix invalid last sg check in\nsk_msg_recvmsg()\"), we change last sg check to sg_is_last(),\nbut in sockmap redirection case (without stream_parser/stream_verdict/\nskb_verdict), we did not mark the end of the scatterlist. Check the\nsk_msg_alloc, sk_msg_page_add, and bpf_msg_push_data functions, they all\ndo not mark the end of sg. They are expected to use sg.end for end\njudgment. So the judgment of \u0027(i != msg_rx-\u003esg.end)\u0027 is added back here.",
  "id": "GHSA-fqp7-97qm-6gwm",
  "modified": "2025-11-13T21:31:17Z",
  "published": "2025-06-18T12:30:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49973"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10ee118a1756141f8e9c87aa7344ed12b41630a8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/583585e48d965338e73e1eb383768d16e0922d73"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de22cba333d8699ad77e79f862fe1320cb1284de"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…