GHSA-FQF6-GXHH-2XHW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-07 19:36 – Updated: 2026-07-07 19:36
VLAI
Summary
uutils coreutils: cp/install/mv/ln --suffix alone does not enable backup mode (silent data loss vs GNU)
Details

determine_backup_mode in src/uucore/src/lib/features/backup_control.rs only checks --backup/-b and returns BackupMode::None when only --suffix is given. GNU enables backup mode when --suffix is used alone (defaulting to existing/numbered, or $VERSION_CONTROL). Affects cp, install, mv, ln which share this code.

# uutils: no backup created
$ coreutils cp --suffix=.bak src dest      # dest.bak NOT created
# GNU: dest.bak created
$ cp --suffix=.bak src dest

Impact: users/scripts relying on --suffix to back up a file before overwrite get silent data loss; breaks GNU compatibility across four utilities. Recommendation: enable backup mode when --suffix is present.

Note: this is primarily a GNU-compatibility/data-safety divergence rather than a classic exploitable vulnerability — review whether it warrants a CVE.

Remediation: Acknowledged by Canonical; fixed in PR #9741 (uucore: use --suffix to enable backup mode), commit 939ab037a, merged 2025-12-21. determine_backup_mode now has a --suffix-alone branch that resolves the mode from $VERSION_CONTROL (defaulting to existing). Released in uucore 0.6.0 and later (vulnerable: < 0.6.0). Regression tests added in the same file: test_backup_mode_suffix_without_backup_option and test_backup_mode_suffix_without_backup_option_with_env_var.


Reported by Zellic in the uutils coreutils Program Security Assessment (prepared for Canonical, Jan 20 2026), audited commit 3a07ffc5a9bd4c283e75afa548ba1f1957bad242. Finding 3.7. Credit: Zellic.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "uucore"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.6.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-440",
      "CWE-693"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-07T19:36:17Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "`determine_backup_mode` in `src/uucore/src/lib/features/backup_control.rs` only checks `--backup`/`-b` and returns `BackupMode::None` when only `--suffix` is given. GNU enables backup mode when `--suffix` is used alone (defaulting to existing/numbered, or `$VERSION_CONTROL`). Affects `cp`, `install`, `mv`, `ln` which share this code.\n\n```\n# uutils: no backup created\n$ coreutils cp --suffix=.bak src dest      # dest.bak NOT created\n# GNU: dest.bak created\n$ cp --suffix=.bak src dest\n```\n\n**Impact:** users/scripts relying on `--suffix` to back up a file before overwrite get silent data loss; breaks GNU compatibility across four utilities. Recommendation: enable backup mode when `--suffix` is present.\n\n_Note: this is primarily a GNU-compatibility/data-safety divergence rather than a classic exploitable vulnerability \u2014 review whether it warrants a CVE._\n\n**Remediation:** Acknowledged by Canonical; fixed in PR #9741 (`uucore: use --suffix to enable backup mode`), commit `939ab037a`, merged 2025-12-21. `determine_backup_mode` now has a `--suffix`-alone branch that resolves the mode from `$VERSION_CONTROL` (defaulting to `existing`). Released in **uucore 0.6.0** and later (vulnerable: `\u003c 0.6.0`). Regression tests added in the same file: `test_backup_mode_suffix_without_backup_option` and `test_backup_mode_suffix_without_backup_option_with_env_var`.\n\n---\n_Reported by Zellic in the *uutils coreutils Program Security Assessment* (prepared for Canonical, Jan 20 2026), audited commit `3a07ffc5a9bd4c283e75afa548ba1f1957bad242`. Finding 3.7. Credit: Zellic._",
  "id": "GHSA-fqf6-gxhh-2xhw",
  "modified": "2026-07-07T19:36:17Z",
  "published": "2026-07-07T19:36:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/security/advisories/GHSA-fqf6-gxhh-2xhw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/9741"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/uutils/coreutils"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "uutils coreutils: cp/install/mv/ln --suffix alone does not enable backup mode (silent data loss vs GNU)"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.