GHSA-FP98-H54J-VWFJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-09-16 15:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ublk: clear VM_MAYWRITE on read-only ublk char device mmap

ublk_ch_mmap() rejects mmap requests with VM_WRITE set, but never clears VM_MAYWRITE on the resulting read-only mapping. This allows a userspace daemon to mmap the per-queue command buffer PROT_READ, then upgrade it to PROT_WRITE via mprotect(), since VM_MAYWRITE was never cleared.

The command buffer holds struct ublksrv_io_desc entries that are kernel-written ABI; a writable mapping lets an unprivileged daemon process corrupt fields such as addr, op_flags, nr_sectors, and start_sector.

Same bug class as the drm/panthor and drm/vc4 VM_MAYWRITE fixes, and the 2026-08-13 ptp/vmclock fix (a5edadbae57e).

Verified via mprotect() PoC: before the fix, a PROT_READ mapping can be upgraded to PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE and a write into the command buffer corrupts io_desc fields (confirmed under KASAN). After the fix, mprotect() returns -EACCES.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89793"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T10:16:55Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nublk: clear VM_MAYWRITE on read-only ublk char device mmap\n\nublk_ch_mmap() rejects mmap requests with VM_WRITE set, but never\nclears VM_MAYWRITE on the resulting read-only mapping. This allows\na userspace daemon to mmap the per-queue command buffer PROT_READ,\nthen upgrade it to PROT_WRITE via mprotect(), since VM_MAYWRITE was\nnever cleared.\n\nThe command buffer holds struct ublksrv_io_desc entries that are\nkernel-written ABI; a writable mapping lets an unprivileged daemon\nprocess corrupt fields such as addr, op_flags, nr_sectors, and\nstart_sector.\n\nSame bug class as the drm/panthor and drm/vc4 VM_MAYWRITE fixes, and\nthe 2026-08-13 ptp/vmclock fix (a5edadbae57e).\n\nVerified via mprotect() PoC: before the fix, a PROT_READ mapping can\nbe upgraded to PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE and a write into the command\nbuffer corrupts io_desc fields (confirmed under KASAN). After the\nfix, mprotect() returns -EACCES.",
  "id": "GHSA-fp98-h54j-vwfj",
  "modified": "2026-09-16T15:30:57Z",
  "published": "2026-09-16T12:30:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89793"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5befd06a72216869b607cf7724a4f16c6a2d3999"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e2b571b0a54755b06e092501913e1dfefe75d6c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/be41733c24be58e2a1ef718c80fafdfb98a40d5e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e373c1acdbcf88cec533ece9f589020adaed0a78"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa5e1bc673ca59722608af67b27e65dba0c97926"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.