GHSA-FJHW-8222-G2HG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:31 – Updated: 2022-07-07 22:59Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jolokia before 1.2.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that execute MBeans methods via a crafted web page.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jolokia:jolokia-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-0168"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-07-07T22:59:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2014-10-06T14:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jolokia before 1.2.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that execute MBeans methods via a crafted web page.",
"id": "GHSA-fjhw-8222-g2hg",
"modified": "2022-07-07T22:59:28Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:31:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0168"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rhuss/jolokia/commit/2d9b168cfbbf5a6d16fa6e8a5b34503e3dc42364"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1351.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Cross-Site Request Forgery in Jolokia"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.