GHSA-FH94-5622-C6W9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 01:27 – Updated: 2022-04-29 01:27
VLAI?
Details

Clearswift MAILsweeper for SMTP 4.3.6 SP1 does not execute custom "on strip unsuccessful" hooks, which allows remote attackers to bypass e-mail attachment filtering policies via an attachment that MAILsweeper can detect but not remove.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2003-1330"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Clearswift MAILsweeper for SMTP 4.3.6 SP1 does not execute custom \"on strip unsuccessful\" hooks, which allows remote attackers to bypass e-mail attachment filtering policies via an attachment that MAILsweeper can detect but not remove.",
  "id": "GHSA-fh94-5622-c6w9",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T01:27:53Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T01:27:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-1330"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11745"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mimesweeper.com/download/bin/Patches/MAILsweeper_Patches_301_ReadMe.htm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7226"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…