GHSA-FH7F-X3GJ-J2VV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-11-05 15:32 – Updated: 2026-11-06 00:32Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests ('HTTP Request/Response smuggling') vulnerability in Apache Sling Engine. The engine's query/form parser accepts non-standard percent-escapes, wrong charsets, and continues request processing on such errors.
This issue affects Apache Sling Engine: before 3.0.4.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.0.4, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-103866"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-436"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-11-05T13:17:07Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (\u0027HTTP Request/Response smuggling\u0027) vulnerability in Apache Sling Engine.\u00a0The engine\u0027s query/form parser accepts non-standard percent-escapes, wrong charsets, and continues request processing on such errors.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Sling Engine: before 3.0.4.\n\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 3.0.4, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "GHSA-fh7f-x3gj-j2vv",
"modified": "2026-11-06T00:32:41Z",
"published": "2026-11-05T15:32:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-103866"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/yoftbty2lc7kmtldmyvj7w0m0n1ncbf6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/11/05/8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.