GHSA-FH3H-VG37-CC95
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-04 14:33 – Updated: 2026-06-04 14:33Impact
When WebOb normalizes the HTTP Location header to include the request hostname, it does so by parsing the URL that the user is to be redirected to with Python's urllib.parse, and joining it to the base URL. urlsplit (called internally by urljoin) however treats a // at the start of a string as a URI without a scheme, and then treats the next part as the hostname. urljoin will then use that hostname from the second part as the hostname replacing the original one from the request.
In a previous advisory https://github.com/Pylons/webob/security/advisories/GHSA-mg3v-6m49-jhp3 an attempt to fix this was made by forcing the replacement of // with /%2f, however this did not take into account that since Python 3.10 urlsplit internally strips ASCII tab, carriage return, and newline characters from the string, so /\t/attacker.com gets turned into //attacker.com and the attacker is able to bypass the changes introduced in that previous advisory, thereby bringing back the problem that was attempted to be fixed.
>>> parse.urlparse("//attacker.com/some/path")
ParseResult(scheme='', netloc='attacker.com', path='/some/path', params='', query='', fragment='')
WebOb uses urljoin to take the request URI and join the redirect location to it, so assuming the request URI is https://example.org/ and the URL to redirect to is /\t/attacker.com/some/path/:
>>> parse.urljoin("https://example.org/", "/\t/attacker.com/some/path/")
'https://attacker.com/some/path/'
Which redirects from example.org where we want the user to stay to attacker.com.
Patches
This issue has been fixed in WebOb 1.8.10.
Workarounds
Any use of the Response class that includes a location can be rewritten to make sure to always pass a full URI that includes the hostname to redirect the user to, or to validate that the redirect target starts with a scheme (e.g. http:// or https://) before assigning to Response.location.
References
- https://github.com/Pylons/webob/security/advisories/GHSA-mg3v-6m49-jhp3
- CVE-2024-42353
Thanks
- Caleb Brown of Google
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.8.9"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "webob"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.8.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44889"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-04T14:33:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nWhen WebOb normalizes the HTTP Location header to include the request hostname, it does so by parsing the URL that the user is to be redirected to with Python\u0027s `urllib.parse`, and joining it to the base URL. `urlsplit` (called internally by `urljoin`) however treats a `//` at the start of a string as a URI without a scheme, and then treats the next part as the hostname. `urljoin` will then use that hostname from the second part as the hostname replacing the original one from the request.\n\nIn a previous advisory https://github.com/Pylons/webob/security/advisories/GHSA-mg3v-6m49-jhp3 an attempt to fix this was made by forcing the replacement of `//` with `/%2f`, however this did not take into account that since Python 3.10 `urlsplit` internally strips ASCII tab, carriage return, and newline characters from the string, so `/\\t/attacker.com` gets turned into `//attacker.com` and the attacker is able to bypass the changes introduced in that previous advisory, thereby bringing back the problem that was attempted to be fixed.\n\n```\n\u003e\u003e\u003e parse.urlparse(\"//attacker.com/some/path\")\nParseResult(scheme=\u0027\u0027, netloc=\u0027attacker.com\u0027, path=\u0027/some/path\u0027, params=\u0027\u0027, query=\u0027\u0027, fragment=\u0027\u0027)\n```\n\nWebOb uses `urljoin` to take the request URI and join the redirect location to it, so assuming the request URI is `https://example.org/` and the URL to redirect to is `/\\t/attacker.com/some/path/`:\n\n```\n\u003e\u003e\u003e parse.urljoin(\"https://example.org/\", \"/\\t/attacker.com/some/path/\")\n\u0027https://attacker.com/some/path/\u0027\n```\n\nWhich redirects from `example.org` where we want the user to stay to `attacker.com`.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis issue has been fixed in WebOb 1.8.10.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nAny use of the `Response` class that includes a `location` can be rewritten to make sure to always pass a full URI that includes the hostname to redirect the user to, or to validate that the redirect target starts with a scheme (e.g. `http://` or `https://`) before assigning to `Response.location`.\n\n### References\n\n- https://github.com/Pylons/webob/security/advisories/GHSA-mg3v-6m49-jhp3\n- CVE-2024-42353\n\n### Thanks\n\n- Caleb Brown of Google",
"id": "GHSA-fh3h-vg37-cc95",
"modified": "2026-06-04T14:33:35Z",
"published": "2026-06-04T14:33:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Pylons/webob/security/advisories/GHSA-fh3h-vg37-cc95"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Pylons/webob/security/advisories/GHSA-mg3v-6m49-jhp3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Pylons/webob/commit/1f681a4f17fc10777ef861e8b43ecb26053bc539"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Pylons/webob/commit/2b9fbedafb31180c910cf8526e9ea72b4603d0bc"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/Pylons/webob"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Pylons/webob/releases/tag/1.8.10"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "WebOb: Location header normalization during redirect leads to open redirect - again"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.