GHSA-FFQ9-G2VV-386P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-21 21:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem
If hmm_range_fault() fails a folio_trylock() in do_swap_page, trying to acquire the lock of a device-private folio for migration, to ram, the function will spin until it succeeds grabbing the lock.
However, if the process holding the lock is depending on a work item to be completed, which is scheduled on the same CPU as the spinning hmm_range_fault(), that work item might be starved and we end up in a livelock / starvation situation which is never resolved.
This can happen, for example if the process holding the device-private folio lock is stuck in migrate_device_unmap()->lru_add_drain_all() sinc lru_add_drain_all() requires a short work-item to be run on all online cpus to complete.
A prerequisite for this to happen is: a) Both zone device and system memory folios are considered in migrate_device_unmap(), so that there is a reason to call lru_add_drain_all() for a system memory folio while a folio lock is held on a zone device folio. b) The zone device folio has an initial mapcount > 1 which causes at least one migration PTE entry insertion to be deferred to try_to_migrate(), which can happen after the call to lru_add_drain_all(). c) No or voluntary only preemption.
This all seems pretty unlikely to happen, but indeed is hit by the "xe_exec_system_allocator" igt test.
Resolve this by waiting for the folio to be unlocked if the folio_trylock() fails in do_swap_page().
Rename migration_entry_wait_on_locked() to softleaf_entry_wait_unlock() and update its documentation to indicate the new use-case.
Future code improvements might consider moving the lru_add_drain_all() call in migrate_device_unmap() to be called after all pages have migration entries inserted. That would eliminate also b) above.
v2: - Instead of a cond_resched() in hmm_range_fault(), eliminate the problem by waiting for the folio to be unlocked in do_swap_page() (Alistair Popple, Andrew Morton) v3: - Add a stub migration_entry_wait_on_locked() for the !CONFIG_MIGRATION case. (Kernel Test Robot) v4: - Rename migrate_entry_wait_on_locked() to softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() and update docs (Alistair Popple) v5: - Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for the !CONFIG_MIGRATION version of softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked(). - Modify wording around function names in the commit message (Andrew Morton)
(cherry picked from commit a69d1ab971a624c6f112cea61536569d579c3215)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-43404"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-667"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T15:16:51Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: Fix a hmm_range_fault() livelock / starvation problem\n\nIf hmm_range_fault() fails a folio_trylock() in do_swap_page,\ntrying to acquire the lock of a device-private folio for migration,\nto ram, the function will spin until it succeeds grabbing the lock.\n\nHowever, if the process holding the lock is depending on a work\nitem to be completed, which is scheduled on the same CPU as the\nspinning hmm_range_fault(), that work item might be starved and\nwe end up in a livelock / starvation situation which is never\nresolved.\n\nThis can happen, for example if the process holding the\ndevice-private folio lock is stuck in\n migrate_device_unmap()-\u003elru_add_drain_all()\nsinc lru_add_drain_all() requires a short work-item\nto be run on all online cpus to complete.\n\nA prerequisite for this to happen is:\na) Both zone device and system memory folios are considered in\n migrate_device_unmap(), so that there is a reason to call\n lru_add_drain_all() for a system memory folio while a\n folio lock is held on a zone device folio.\nb) The zone device folio has an initial mapcount \u003e 1 which causes\n at least one migration PTE entry insertion to be deferred to\n try_to_migrate(), which can happen after the call to\n lru_add_drain_all().\nc) No or voluntary only preemption.\n\nThis all seems pretty unlikely to happen, but indeed is hit by\nthe \"xe_exec_system_allocator\" igt test.\n\nResolve this by waiting for the folio to be unlocked if the\nfolio_trylock() fails in do_swap_page().\n\nRename migration_entry_wait_on_locked() to\nsoftleaf_entry_wait_unlock() and update its documentation to\nindicate the new use-case.\n\nFuture code improvements might consider moving\nthe lru_add_drain_all() call in migrate_device_unmap() to be\ncalled *after* all pages have migration entries inserted.\nThat would eliminate also b) above.\n\nv2:\n- Instead of a cond_resched() in hmm_range_fault(),\n eliminate the problem by waiting for the folio to be unlocked\n in do_swap_page() (Alistair Popple, Andrew Morton)\nv3:\n- Add a stub migration_entry_wait_on_locked() for the\n !CONFIG_MIGRATION case. (Kernel Test Robot)\nv4:\n- Rename migrate_entry_wait_on_locked() to\n softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() and update docs (Alistair Popple)\nv5:\n- Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for the !CONFIG_MIGRATION\n version of softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked().\n- Modify wording around function names in the commit message\n (Andrew Morton)\n\n(cherry picked from commit a69d1ab971a624c6f112cea61536569d579c3215)",
"id": "GHSA-ffq9-g2vv-386p",
"modified": "2026-05-21T21:30:30Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T15:31:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43404"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e6e2fc91d4b9b12ec6e137019532568ebcf2680"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94b6d0ba4b640ba23bb6c708a59316e74e5ede63"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b570f37a2ce480be26c665345c5514686a8a0274"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.