GHSA-FF8P-PFWC-WJF2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:04 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:04
VLAI
Details

On NXP MIFARE Ultralight and NTAG cards, an attacker can interrupt a write operation (aka conduct a "tear off" attack) over RFID to bypass a Monotonic Counter protection mechanism. The impact depends on how the anti tear-off feature is used in specific applications such as public transportation, physical access control, etc.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-33881"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-06-06T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "On NXP MIFARE Ultralight and NTAG cards, an attacker can interrupt a write operation (aka conduct a \"tear off\" attack) over RFID to bypass a Monotonic Counter protection mechanism. The impact depends on how the anti tear-off feature is used in specific applications such as public transportation, physical access control, etc.",
  "id": "GHSA-ff8p-pfwc-wjf2",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:04:09Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:04:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-33881"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.quarkslab.com/rfid-monotonic-counter-anti-tearing-defeated.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN11340.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN13089.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.sstic.org/2021/presentation/eeprom_it_will_all_end_in_tears"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…