GHSA-F9HW-35V5-6X52
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-19 18:31
VLAI
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: codecs: pcm512x: fix null-ptr dereference in pcm512x_overclock_xxx_put()
In the pcm512x chipset driver, pcm512x_overclock_xxx_put() is defined as a general mixer kcontrol instead of a DAPM kcontrol, so struct snd_soc_dapm_context must not be accessed via snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_to_dapm().
This causes a NULL pointer dereference, so it must be modified to use snd_soc_component_to_dapm().
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-64107"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:52Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nASoC: codecs: pcm512x: fix null-ptr dereference in pcm512x_overclock_xxx_put()\n\nIn the pcm512x chipset driver, pcm512x_overclock_xxx_put() is defined as\na general mixer kcontrol instead of a DAPM kcontrol, so struct\nsnd_soc_dapm_context must not be accessed via\nsnd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_to_dapm().\n\nThis causes a NULL pointer dereference, so it must be modified to use\nsnd_soc_component_to_dapm().",
"id": "GHSA-f9hw-35v5-6x52",
"modified": "2026-07-19T18:31:52Z",
"published": "2026-07-19T18:31:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64107"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09e8f9a9aa19aa8c1b0cc7a0ebc68f6ecf86a660"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/285159ca199cbbe424223d4b14db227b279b5767"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…