Vulnerability-Lookup

GHSA-F95R-2GGC-W963

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-14 09:30 – Updated: 2025-05-14 09:30

Details

Violation of Secure Design Principles, Hidden Functionality, Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality vulnerability in ArcGIS (Authentication) allows Privilege Abuse, Manipulating Hidden Fields, Configuration/Environment Manipulation.

The ArcGIS client_credentials OAuth 2.0 API implementation does not adhere to the RFC/standards; This hidden (known and by-design, but undocumented) functionality enables a requestor (Referred to as client in RFC 6749) to request an, undocumented, custom token expiration from ArcGIS (Referred to as authorization server in RFC 6749).

Severity

7.9 (High)


                  
                    CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/U:Amber

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-0020"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-657"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-14T08:15:33Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Violation of Secure Design Principles, Hidden Functionality, Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality vulnerability in ArcGIS (Authentication) allows Privilege Abuse, Manipulating Hidden Fields, Configuration/Environment Manipulation.\n\nThe ArcGIS client_credentials OAuth 2.0 API implementation does not adhere to the RFC/standards; This hidden (known and by-design, but undocumented) functionality enables a requestor (Referred to as client in RFC 6749) to request an, undocumented, custom token expiration from ArcGIS (Referred to as authorization server in RFC 6749).",
  "id": "GHSA-f95r-2ggc-w963",
  "modified": "2025-05-14T09:30:25Z",
  "published": "2025-05-14T09:30:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-0020"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://developers.arcgis.com/documentation/security-and-authentication"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulsec.org/advisories"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Amber",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

CVE-2025-0020 (GCVE-0-2025-0020)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-05-14 07:54 – Updated: 2025-05-19 19:07

“This CVE ID is Rejected and will not be used. As the CNA of record ESRI has rejected this CVE as it is not a vulnerability”

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-05-19T19:07:02.724Z",
        "orgId": "cedc17bb-4939-4f40-a1f4-30ae8af1094e",
        "shortName": "Esri"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u201cThis CVE ID is Rejected and will not be used.  As the CNA of record ESRI has rejected this CVE as it is not a vulnerability\u201d"
            }
          ],
          "value": "\u201cThis CVE ID is Rejected and will not be used.  As the CNA of record ESRI has rejected this CVE as it is not a vulnerability\u201d"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "2fdefc65-d750-4b8d-96ee-6e2c0c42dbfe",
    "assignerShortName": "VULSec",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-0020",
    "datePublished": "2025-05-14T07:54:57.843Z",
    "dateRejected": "2025-05-16T17:44:02.099Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-11-06T08:36:01.058Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-05-19T19:07:02.724Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

Order JSON

Publication & reservation Sightings KEV catalogs Other timestamps

Loading timeline…

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted