GHSA-F4WJ-QQ69-7P3Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:50 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:50
VLAI
Details
The ke_questionnaire extension 2.5.2 and earlier for TYPO3 uses predictable names for the questionnaire answer forms, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a direct request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-8874"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-12-02T16:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The ke_questionnaire extension 2.5.2 and earlier for TYPO3 uses predictable names for the questionnaire answer forms, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a direct request.",
"id": "GHSA-f4wj-qq69-7p3q",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:50:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:50:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8874"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2014-009"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Dec/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/534126/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…