GHSA-F448-R8G9-P8J7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-21 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/migrate_device: clear stale mapping after freeing swapcache
__migrate_device_pages() reads the folio mapping before calling folio_free_swap(). When folio_free_swap() succeeds, the folio is removed from the swap cache, but the saved mapping still points to swap_space.
Passing the stale mapping to folio_migrate_mapping() makes it use the mapped-folio path for a folio that is no longer in swapcache. It can then operate on swap_space.i_pages with invalid reference accounting, eventually triggering a folio reference count BUG.
After a successful split, nr still contains the number of pages in the original large folio, although each resulting page is now a separate order-0 folio. Reset nr to 1 so each split folio is processed separately, including its own swapcache removal and mapping lookup.
Refresh the saved mapping after folio_free_swap() so the current folio state is used during migration.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-89755"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:20:06Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/migrate_device: clear stale mapping after freeing swapcache\n\n__migrate_device_pages() reads the folio mapping before calling\nfolio_free_swap(). When folio_free_swap() succeeds, the folio is removed\nfrom the swap cache, but the saved mapping still points to swap_space.\n\nPassing the stale mapping to folio_migrate_mapping() makes it use the\nmapped-folio path for a folio that is no longer in swapcache. It can then\noperate on swap_space.i_pages with invalid reference accounting,\neventually triggering a folio reference count BUG.\n\nAfter a successful split, nr still contains the number of pages in the\noriginal large folio, although each resulting page is now a separate\norder-0 folio. Reset nr to 1 so each split folio is processed separately,\nincluding its own swapcache removal and mapping lookup.\n\nRefresh the saved mapping after folio_free_swap() so the current folio\nstate is used during migration.",
"id": "GHSA-f448-r8g9-p8j7",
"modified": "2026-09-21T15:31:37Z",
"published": "2026-09-11T21:31:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89755"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/34a00895d032a414830d41106a09329ae6c251b6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4fa91f7bbc4135240b67daac03fc17d9e180a331"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ffedc6573a665cdc31ebe47eae7b32b78d0df83"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.