GHSA-F2M7-5M7M-7G2C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 18:32 – Updated: 2026-06-24 18:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix data loss caused by incorrect use of nat_entry flag

Data loss can occur when fsync is performed on a newly created file (before any checkpoint has been written) concurrently with a checkpoint operation. The scenario is as follows:

create & write & fsync 'file A' write checkpoint - f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty - f2fs_write_checkpoint - f2fs_flush_merged_writes - f2fs_sync_node_pages - f2fs_flush_nat_entries - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return false SPO and lost 'file A'

f2fs_flush_nat_entries() sets the IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_LAST_FSYNC flags for the nat_entry, but this does not mean that the checkpoint has actually completed successfully. However, f2fs_need_inode_block_update() checks these flags and incorrectly assumes that the checkpoint has finished.

The root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_LAST_FSYNC are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write fully completes.

This patch modifies f2fs_need_inode_block_update() to acquire the sbi->node_write lock before reading the nat_entry flags, ensuring that once IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_LAST_FSYNC are observed to be set, the checkpoint operation has already completed.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53017"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T17:17:13Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix data loss caused by incorrect use of nat_entry flag\n\nData loss can occur when fsync is performed on a newly created file\n(before any checkpoint has been written) concurrently with a checkpoint\noperation. The scenario is as follows:\n\ncreate \u0026 write \u0026 fsync \u0027file A\u0027                 write checkpoint\n- f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode\n - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty\n                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint\n                                                 - f2fs_flush_merged_writes\n                                                 - f2fs_sync_node_pages\n                                                 - f2fs_flush_nat_entries\n - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node\n - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return false\n SPO and lost \u0027file A\u0027\n\nf2fs_flush_nat_entries() sets the IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_LAST_FSYNC\nflags for the nat_entry, but this does not mean that the checkpoint has\nactually completed successfully. However, f2fs_need_inode_block_update()\nchecks these flags and incorrectly assumes that the checkpoint has\nfinished.\n\nThe root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and\nHAS_LAST_FSYNC are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write fully\ncompletes.\n\nThis patch modifies f2fs_need_inode_block_update() to acquire the\nsbi-\u003enode_write lock before reading the nat_entry flags, ensuring that\nonce IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_LAST_FSYNC are observed to be set, the\ncheckpoint operation has already completed.",
  "id": "GHSA-f2m7-5m7m-7g2c",
  "modified": "2026-06-24T18:32:43Z",
  "published": "2026-06-24T18:32:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53017"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20cedb4d9f6b230d0ee469690b8f868f06a07c29"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/238e14eb7226f883b72caccd2d37bf5707df066b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…