GHSA-CXWF-QC32-375F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-12 19:52 – Updated: 2024-11-13 23:24
VLAI
Summary
Decidim-Awesome has SQL injection in AdminAccountability
Details

Vulnerability type:

CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Vendor:

Decidim International Community Environment

Has vendor confirmed:

Yes

Attack type:

Remote

Impact:

Code Execution Escalation of Privileges Information Disclosure

Affected component:

A raw sql-statement that uses an interpolated variable exists in the admin_role_actions method of the papertrail/version-model(app/models/decidim/decidim_awesome/paper_trail_version.rb).

Attack vector:

An attacker with admin permissions could manipulate database queries in order to read out the database, read files from the filesystem, write files from the filesystem. In the worst case, this could lead to remote code execution on the server. Description of the vulnerability for use in the CVE [ℹ] (https://cveproject.github.io/docs/content/key-details- phrasing.pdf) : An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command in the papertrail/version- model of the decidim_awesome-module <= v0.11.1 (> 0.9.0) allows an authenticated admin user to manipulate sql queries to disclose information, read and write files or execute commands.

Discoverer Credits:

Wolfgang Hotwagner

References:

https://pentest.ait.ac.at/security-advisory/decidim-awesome-sql-injection-in-adminaccountability/ https://portswigger.net/web-security/sql-injection

Severity
9.0 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
8.5 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "decidim-decidim_awesome"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.9.1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.10.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "decidim-decidim_awesome"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.11.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.11.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-43415"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-89"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-11-12T19:52:22Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-12T16:15:21Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Vulnerability type: \nCWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)\n## Vendor: \nDecidim International Community Environment\n\n### Has vendor con\ufb01rmed: \nYes\n\n### Attack type:\nRemote\n\n### Impact:\nCode Execution\nEscalation of Privileges\nInformation Disclosure\n\n### A\ufb00ected component:\nA raw sql-statement that uses an interpolated variable exists in the admin_role_actions method of the\n`papertrail/version-model(app/models/decidim/decidim_awesome/paper_trail_version.rb`).\n\n### Attack vector:\n\nAn attacker with admin permissions could manipulate database queries in order to read out the database,\nread \ufb01les from the \ufb01lesystem, write \ufb01les from the \ufb01lesystem. In the worst case, this could lead to remote code\nexecution on the server.\nDescription of the vulnerability for use in the CVE [\u2139] (https://cveproject.github.io/docs/content/key-details-\nphrasing.pdf) : An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command in the `papertrail/version-\nmodel` of the decidim_awesome-module \u003c= v0.11.1 (\u003e 0.9.0) allows an authenticated admin user to manipulate sql queries\nto disclose information, read and write files or execute commands.\n\n### Discoverer Credits:\nWolfgang Hotwagner\n\n### References:\nhttps://pentest.ait.ac.at/security-advisory/decidim-awesome-sql-injection-in-adminaccountability/\nhttps://portswigger.net/web-security/sql-injection",
  "id": "GHSA-cxwf-qc32-375f",
  "modified": "2024-11-13T23:24:27Z",
  "published": "2024-11-12T19:52:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/decidim-ice/decidim-module-decidim_awesome/security/advisories/GHSA-cxwf-qc32-375f"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43415"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/decidim-ice/decidim-module-decidim_awesome/commit/84374037d34a3ac80dc18406834169c65869f11b"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/decidim-ice/decidim-module-decidim_awesome"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/decidim-decidim_awesome/CVE-2024-43415.yml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pentest.ait.ac.at/security-advisory/decidim-awesome-sql-injection-in-adminaccountability"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Decidim-Awesome has SQL injection in AdminAccountability"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.