GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-CWPJ-WXFP-CRC5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-02 09:30 – Updated: 2025-03-17 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

x86/lib: Revert to _ASM_EXTABLE_UA() for {get,put}_user() fixups

During memory error injection test on kernels >= v6.4, the kernel panics like below. However, this issue couldn't be reproduced on kernels <= v6.3.

mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 296: Machine Check Exception: f Bank 1: bd80000000100134 mce: [Hardware Error]: RIP 10: {__get_user_nocheck_4+0x6/0x20} mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 411a93533ed ADDR 346a8730040 MISC 86 mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:a06d0 TIME 1706000767 SOCKET 1 APIC 211 microcode 80001490 mce: [Hardware Error]: Run the above through 'mcelog --ascii' mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check: Data load in unrecoverable area of kernel Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal local machine check

The MCA code can recover from an in-kernel #MC if the fixup type is EX_TYPE_UACCESS, explicitly indicating that the kernel is attempting to access userspace memory. However, if the fixup type is EX_TYPE_DEFAULT the only thing that is raised for an in-kernel #MC is a panic.

ex_handler_uaccess() would warn if users gave a non-canonical addresses (with bit 63 clear) to {get, put}_user(), which was unexpected.

Therefore, commit

b19b74bc99b1 ("x86/mm: Rework address range check in get_user() and put_user()")

replaced _ASM_EXTABLE_UA() with _ASM_EXTABLE() for {get, put}_user() fixups. However, the new fixup type EX_TYPE_DEFAULT results in a panic.

Commit

6014bc27561f ("x86-64: make access_ok() independent of LAM")

added the check gp_fault_address_ok() right before the WARN_ONCE() in ex_handler_uaccess() to not warn about non-canonical user addresses due to LAM.

With that in place, revert back to _ASM_EXTABLE_UA() for {get,put}_user() exception fixups in order to be able to handle in-kernel MCEs correctly again.

[ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-26674"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-02T07:15:44Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/lib: Revert to _ASM_EXTABLE_UA() for {get,put}_user() fixups\n\nDuring memory error injection test on kernels \u003e= v6.4, the kernel panics\nlike below. However, this issue couldn\u0027t be reproduced on kernels \u003c= v6.3.\n\n  mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 296: Machine Check Exception: f Bank 1: bd80000000100134\n  mce: [Hardware Error]: RIP 10:\u003cffffffff821b9776\u003e {__get_user_nocheck_4+0x6/0x20}\n  mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 411a93533ed ADDR 346a8730040 MISC 86\n  mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:a06d0 TIME 1706000767 SOCKET 1 APIC 211 microcode 80001490\n  mce: [Hardware Error]: Run the above through \u0027mcelog --ascii\u0027\n  mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check: Data load in unrecoverable area of kernel\n  Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal local machine check\n\nThe MCA code can recover from an in-kernel #MC if the fixup type is\nEX_TYPE_UACCESS, explicitly indicating that the kernel is attempting to\naccess userspace memory. However, if the fixup type is EX_TYPE_DEFAULT\nthe only thing that is raised for an in-kernel #MC is a panic.\n\nex_handler_uaccess() would warn if users gave a non-canonical addresses\n(with bit 63 clear) to {get, put}_user(), which was unexpected.\n\nTherefore, commit\n\n  b19b74bc99b1 (\"x86/mm: Rework address range check in get_user() and put_user()\")\n\nreplaced _ASM_EXTABLE_UA() with _ASM_EXTABLE() for {get, put}_user()\nfixups. However, the new fixup type EX_TYPE_DEFAULT results in a panic.\n\nCommit\n\n  6014bc27561f (\"x86-64: make access_ok() independent of LAM\")\n\nadded the check gp_fault_address_ok() right before the WARN_ONCE() in\nex_handler_uaccess() to not warn about non-canonical user addresses due\nto LAM.\n\nWith that in place, revert back to _ASM_EXTABLE_UA() for {get,put}_user()\nexception fixups in order to be able to handle in-kernel MCEs correctly\nagain.\n\n  [ bp: Massage commit message. ]",
  "id": "GHSA-cwpj-wxfp-crc5",
  "modified": "2025-03-17T18:31:38Z",
  "published": "2024-04-02T09:30:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26674"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2aed1b6c33afd8599d01c6532bbecb829480a674"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2da241c5ed78d0978228a1150735539fe1a60eca"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8eed4e00a370b37b4e5985ed983dccedd555ea9d"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…