GHSA-CW2F-QVGG-223G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-27 15:33 – Updated: 2026-05-27 15:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ima: Fix stack-out-of-bounds in is_bprm_creds_for_exec()

KASAN reported a stack-out-of-bounds access in ima_appraise_measurement from is_bprm_creds_for_exec:

BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in ima_appraise_measurement+0x12dc/0x16a0 Read of size 1 at addr ffffc9000160f940 by task sudo/550 The buggy address belongs to stack of task sudo/550 and is located at offset 24 in frame: ima_appraise_measurement+0x0/0x16a0 This frame has 2 objects: [48, 56) 'file' [80, 148) 'hash'

This is caused by using container_of on the *file pointer. This offset calculation is what triggers the stack-out-of-bounds error.

In order to fix this, pass in a bprm_is_check boolean which can be set depending on how process_measurement is called. If the caller has a linux_binprm pointer and the function is BPRM_CHECK we can determine is_check and set it then. Otherwise set it to false.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-71306"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-27T14:16:43Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nima: Fix stack-out-of-bounds in is_bprm_creds_for_exec()\n\nKASAN reported a stack-out-of-bounds access in ima_appraise_measurement\nfrom is_bprm_creds_for_exec:\n\nBUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in ima_appraise_measurement+0x12dc/0x16a0\n Read of size 1 at addr ffffc9000160f940 by task sudo/550\nThe buggy address belongs to stack of task sudo/550\nand is located at offset 24 in frame:\n  ima_appraise_measurement+0x0/0x16a0\nThis frame has 2 objects:\n  [48, 56) \u0027file\u0027\n  [80, 148) \u0027hash\u0027\n\nThis is caused by using container_of on the *file pointer. This offset\ncalculation is what triggers the stack-out-of-bounds error.\n\nIn order to fix this, pass in a bprm_is_check boolean which can be set\ndepending on how process_measurement is called. If the caller has a\nlinux_binprm pointer and the function is BPRM_CHECK we can determine\nis_check and set it then. Otherwise set it to false.",
  "id": "GHSA-cw2f-qvgg-223g",
  "modified": "2026-05-27T15:33:10Z",
  "published": "2026-05-27T15:33:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71306"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/377cae9851e8559e9d8b82a78c1ac0abeb18839c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab3d16da982a4ebb715d487dbf9dd66e3990d935"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…