GHSA-CVJM-JX7M-3JQC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:16 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:16Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Stark CRM 1.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add (1) an administrator via a crafted request to the admin page, (2) an agent via a crafted request to the agent page, (3) a sub-agent via a crafted request to the sub_agent page, (4) a partner via a crafted request to the partner page, or (5) a client via a crafted request to the client page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-10008"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-01-13T11:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Stark CRM 1.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add (1) an administrator via a crafted request to the admin page, (2) an agent via a crafted request to the agent page, (3) a sub-agent via a crafted request to the sub_agent page, (4) a partner via a crafted request to the partner page, or (5) a client via a crafted request to the client page.",
"id": "GHSA-cvjm-jx7m-3jqc",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:16:04Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:16:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-10008"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/91267"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/91268"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/57048"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.zeroscience.mk/codes/starkcrm_mv.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.zeroscience.mk/en/vulnerabilities/ZSL-2014-5169.php"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.