GHSA-CRFG-8XHR-7Q4W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-12 18:31 – Updated: 2025-12-10 00:30
VLAI?
Details

If kdcproxy receives a request for a realm which does not have server addresses defined in its configuration, by default, it will query SRV records in the DNS zone matching the requested realm name. This creates a server-side request forgery vulnerability, since an attacker could send a request for a realm matching a DNS zone where they created SRV records pointing to arbitrary ports and hostnames (which may resolve to loopback or internal IP addresses). This vulnerability can be exploited to probe internal network topology and firewall rules, perform port scanning, and exfiltrate data. Deployments where the "use_dns" setting is explicitly set to false are not affected.

Severity ?
8.6 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-59088"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-12T17:15:38Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "If kdcproxy receives a request for a realm which does not have server addresses defined in its configuration, by default, it will query SRV records in the DNS zone matching the requested realm name. This creates a server-side request forgery vulnerability, since an attacker could send a request for a realm matching a DNS zone where they created SRV records pointing to arbitrary ports and hostnames (which may resolve to loopback or internal IP addresses). This vulnerability can be exploited to probe internal network topology and firewall rules, perform port scanning, and exfiltrate data. Deployments where\nthe \"use_dns\" setting is explicitly set to false are not affected.",
  "id": "GHSA-crfg-8xhr-7q4w",
  "modified": "2025-12-10T00:30:21Z",
  "published": "2025-11-12T18:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59088"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/latchset/kdcproxy/pull/68"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2393955"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-59088"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:22982"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21821"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21820"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21819"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21818"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21806"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21748"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21448"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21142"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21141"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21140"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21139"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:21138"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.