GHSA-CQHP-GWHX-VMWP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/hugetlb: fix hugetlb cgroup rsvd charge/uncharge mismatch
In alloc_hugetlb_folio(), a single h_cg pointer is used for both the rsvd and non-rsvd hugetlb cgroup charges. When map_chg is set, hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup_rsvd() stores the charged cgroup in h_cg, but the immediately following hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup() overwrites h_cg with the non-rsvd cgroup pointer.
As a result, hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge_rsvd() stores the wrong (non-rsvd) cgroup pointer into the folio's rsvd slot.
When the folio is later freed, free_huge_folio() unconditionally calls both hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio() and hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(). The rsvd uncharge reads back the wrong cgroup from the folio and decrements a counter that was never charged for that cgroup, causing a page_counter underflow:
page_counter underflow: -512 nr_pages=512 WARNING: mm/page_counter.c:61 at page_counter_cancel
Fix this by introducing a separate h_cg_rsvd pointer exclusively for the rsvd charge path, keeping the rsvd and non-rsvd charges fully independent through their charge, commit, and error uncharge paths.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-72213"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:40Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/hugetlb: fix hugetlb cgroup rsvd charge/uncharge mismatch\n\nIn alloc_hugetlb_folio(), a single h_cg pointer is used for both the rsvd\nand non-rsvd hugetlb cgroup charges. When map_chg is set,\nhugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup_rsvd() stores the charged cgroup in h_cg, but\nthe immediately following hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup() overwrites h_cg\nwith the non-rsvd cgroup pointer.\n\nAs a result, hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge_rsvd() stores the wrong\n(non-rsvd) cgroup pointer into the folio\u0027s rsvd slot.\n\nWhen the folio is later freed, free_huge_folio() unconditionally calls\nboth hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio() and\nhugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(). The rsvd uncharge reads back the\nwrong cgroup from the folio and decrements a counter that was never\ncharged for that cgroup, causing a page_counter underflow:\n\n page_counter underflow: -512 nr_pages=512\n WARNING: mm/page_counter.c:61 at page_counter_cancel\n\nFix this by introducing a separate h_cg_rsvd pointer exclusively for the\nrsvd charge path, keeping the rsvd and non-rsvd charges fully independent\nthrough their charge, commit, and error uncharge paths.",
"id": "GHSA-cqhp-gwhx-vmwp",
"modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:16Z",
"published": "2026-08-15T06:32:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72213"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15807d0ddde37407af72859426b654f3d1972b00"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1697d253f51cf5e3825a3423ff49e128a3502ab2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c32ae4a91fb5f4941328e0c1720a7fa4189c3bd"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b785f2bd9496facedc0a031be09cddcd1d3c84d3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.