GHSA-CQC6-9F34-295V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-21 15:34 – Updated: 2026-05-21 15:34
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()

remove_waiter() is used by the slowlock paths, but it is also used for proxy-lock rollback in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() when invoked from futex_requeue().

In the latter case waiter::task is not current, but remove_waiter() operates on current for the dequeue operation. That results in several problems:

1) the rbtree dequeue happens without waiter::task::pi_lock being held

2) the waiter task's pi_blocked_on state is not cleared, which leaves a dangling pointer primed for UAF around.

3) rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain() operates on the wrong top priority waiter task

Use waiter::task instead of current in all related operations in remove_waiter() to cure those problems.

[ tglx: Fixup rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(), add a comment and amend the changelog ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43499"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-21T13:16:19Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()\n\nremove_waiter() is used by the slowlock paths, but it is also used for\nproxy-lock rollback in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() when invoked from\nfutex_requeue().\n\nIn the latter case waiter::task is not current, but remove_waiter()\noperates on current for the dequeue operation. That results in several\nproblems:\n\n  1) the rbtree dequeue happens without waiter::task::pi_lock being held\n\n  2) the waiter task\u0027s pi_blocked_on state is not cleared, which leaves a\n     dangling pointer primed for UAF around.\n\n  3) rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain() operates on the wrong top priority waiter\n     task\n\nUse waiter::task instead of current in all related operations in\nremove_waiter() to cure those problems.\n\n[ tglx: Fixup rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(), add a comment and amend the\n  \tchangelog ]",
  "id": "GHSA-cqc6-9f34-295v",
  "modified": "2026-05-21T15:34:08Z",
  "published": "2026-05-21T15:34:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43499"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bfdc63936dd4773109b7b8c280c0f3b5ae7d349"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3fb7394a837740770f0d6b4b30567e60786a63f2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d52dfcb2a5db86e346cf51f8fcf2071b8085166"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88614876370aac8ad1050ad785a4c095ba17ac11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a1fc8d698ac5e5916e3082a0f74450d71f9611f"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…