GHSA-CQ4Q-CV5G-R8Q5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 20:44 – Updated: 2026-06-15 20:44
VLAI
Summary
Netty: QUIC stateless reset token material exposed through header-visible connection IDs
Details

Summary

Netty QUIC exposes the stateless reset token on the network path when using the default HMAC-based connection-ID and stateless-reset-token generators. The reset token for the server's current source connection ID can be derived from bytes that appear as the connection ID in QUIC headers after a source-CID rotation. An on-path attacker observing the headers can use the token to perform a Denial of Service by sending a spoofed Stateless Reset packet.

Details

The sign-based connection ID generator (HmacSignQuicConnectionIdGenerator) and reset token generator (HmacSignQuicResetTokenGenerator) both evaluate HMAC-SHA256 with the same JVM-wide static key (io.netty.handler.codec.quic.Hmac).

During source CID rotation (QuicheQuicChannel.newSourceConnectionIds), the current server source CID C is used as input to produce the next CID N. The stateless reset token for C is defined over HMAC(K, C), specifically the first 16 bytes. The next CID N is the first L bytes of the same digest, where L = |C|.

Whenever L ≥ 16, the first 16 bytes of N are exactly the stateless reset token for C. Because N is carried in QUIC headers as a connection ID, an observer can read the headers and learn the reset token without decrypting the payload.

This directly violates RFC 9000 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9000#name-calculating-a-stateless-res: The stateless reset token MUST be difficult to guess. Additionally https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9000#name-stateless-reset-oracle

Impact

Information Disclosure and Denial of Service. An on-path attacker can obtain the stateless reset token from the connection ID header and attempt to abruptly close the client side of the connection by sending a spoofed Stateless Reset datagram.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.2.14.Final"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.netty:netty-codec-classes-quic"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.2.0.Final"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.15.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-50009"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200",
      "CWE-330"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T20:44:20Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-12T16:16:31Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nNetty QUIC exposes the stateless reset token on the network path when using the default HMAC-based connection-ID and stateless-reset-token generators. The reset token for the server\u0027s current source connection ID can be derived from bytes that appear as the connection ID in QUIC headers after a source-CID rotation. An on-path attacker observing the headers can use the token to perform a Denial of Service by sending a spoofed Stateless Reset packet.\n\n### Details\nThe sign-based connection ID generator (HmacSignQuicConnectionIdGenerator) and reset token generator (HmacSignQuicResetTokenGenerator) both evaluate HMAC-SHA256 with the same JVM-wide static key (io.netty.handler.codec.quic.Hmac).\n\nDuring source CID rotation (QuicheQuicChannel.newSourceConnectionIds), the current server source CID C is used as input to produce the next CID N. The stateless reset token for C is defined over HMAC(K, C), specifically the first 16 bytes. The next CID N is the first L bytes of the same digest, where L = |C|.\n\nWhenever L \u2265 16, the first 16 bytes of N are exactly the stateless reset token for C. Because N is carried in QUIC headers as a connection ID, an observer can read the headers and learn the reset token without decrypting the payload.\n\nThis directly violates RFC 9000\nhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9000#name-calculating-a-stateless-res: `The stateless reset token MUST be difficult to guess.`\nAdditionally https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9000#name-stateless-reset-oracle\n\n### Impact\nInformation Disclosure and Denial of Service. An on-path attacker can obtain the stateless reset token from the connection ID header and attempt to abruptly close the client side of the connection by sending a spoofed Stateless Reset datagram.",
  "id": "GHSA-cq4q-cv5g-r8q5",
  "modified": "2026-06-15T20:44:20Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T20:44:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-cq4q-cv5g-r8q5"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50009"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Netty: QUIC stateless reset token material exposed through header-visible connection IDs"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…