GHSA-CQ4J-9R28-WXQG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: rtw89: fix wrong pci_get_drvdata type in AER handlers

rtw89 stores an ieee80211_hw pointer via pci_set_drvdata() at probe time, but io_error_detected() and io_resume() retrieve it as a net_device pointer. This causes netif_device_detach/attach to operate on an ieee80211_hw struct, reading and writing at wrong offsets. The adjacent io_slot_reset() already does it correctly.

Use ieee80211_stop_queues/wake_queues instead, consistent with every other queue stop/start path in the driver.

Tested on RTL8852CE by calling the handlers from a test module before and after the fix.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-74413"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:43Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: rtw89: fix wrong pci_get_drvdata type in AER handlers\n\nrtw89 stores an ieee80211_hw pointer via pci_set_drvdata() at probe\ntime, but io_error_detected() and io_resume() retrieve it as a\nnet_device pointer.  This causes netif_device_detach/attach to\noperate on an ieee80211_hw struct, reading and writing at wrong\noffsets.  The adjacent io_slot_reset() already does it correctly.\n\nUse ieee80211_stop_queues/wake_queues instead, consistent with\nevery other queue stop/start path in the driver.\n\nTested on RTL8852CE by calling the handlers from a test module\nbefore and after the fix.",
  "id": "GHSA-cq4j-9r28-wxqg",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:44Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74413"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7068c379cf9aa8afe4dce4d9d82390187aa9c4d0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aefc30e4a829c1683f6ae999df7f9310c27eae6c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c1907b9a4fa9cb33d11a9af138374dd2e93f7a93"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.