GHSA-CP82-3R67-94RF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-14 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

libnvdimm/labels: Prevent integer overflow in __nd_label_validate()

The on-media namespace index field nslot is a u32 read from the DIMM label storage area. __nd_label_validate() bounds it against the config area size, but sizeof_namespace_label() returns unsigned, so the product nslot * label_size is evaluated in 32-bit and wraps modulo 2^32 before the comparison. A crafted nslot passes the bound and is then used as the loop trip count in nd_label_data_init(), whose memset() walks off the end of the config_size buffer: an out-of-bounds write.

The field is not trusted -- it comes from the medium, or from userspace via ND_CMD_SET_CONFIG_DATA. Evaluate the product in 64-bit so the bound check is exact; conforming labels are unaffected.

The check was safe when introduced by commit 4a826c83db4e ("libnvdimm: namespace indices: read and validate"): it multiplied by sizeof(struct nd_namespace_label), a size_t, so on a 64-bit build the product did not wrap. Commit 564e871aa66f ("libnvdimm, label: add v1.2 nvdimm label definitions") narrowed it to 32 bits when the label size became a runtime value read via sizeof_namespace_label().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89559"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:39Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlibnvdimm/labels: Prevent integer overflow in __nd_label_validate()\n\nThe on-media namespace index field nslot is a u32 read from the DIMM\nlabel storage area.  __nd_label_validate() bounds it against the config\narea size, but sizeof_namespace_label() returns unsigned, so the product\nnslot * label_size is evaluated in 32-bit and wraps modulo 2^32 before\nthe comparison.  A crafted nslot passes the bound and is then used as the\nloop trip count in nd_label_data_init(), whose memset() walks off the end\nof the config_size buffer: an out-of-bounds write.\n\nThe field is not trusted -- it comes from the medium, or from userspace\nvia ND_CMD_SET_CONFIG_DATA.  Evaluate the product in 64-bit so the bound\ncheck is exact; conforming labels are unaffected.\n\nThe check was safe when introduced by commit 4a826c83db4e (\"libnvdimm:\nnamespace indices: read and validate\"): it multiplied by sizeof(struct\nnd_namespace_label), a size_t, so on a 64-bit build the product did not\nwrap.  Commit 564e871aa66f (\"libnvdimm, label: add v1.2 nvdimm label\ndefinitions\") narrowed it to 32 bits when the label size became a runtime\nvalue read via sizeof_namespace_label().",
  "id": "GHSA-cp82-3r67-94rf",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T15:32:29Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89559"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/037770686126155eafc44501312989e2837b9659"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09e649117c54b7e1c004f22eaa19efbadd9ac856"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c391696d2791f82ae462e11da9a0d96f90b240c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6030597ec683d1e5b46445f888bb5c7776b5a0c4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69a734359639fca16a0dd73ab17a34943e76c68b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93967bfb17dab66642c57e609c99e1a91fe11278"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4975f2ff6c82adc24ae547f029f82530ba43cfe"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e057efcc9c71d90099d9ee00bed0748d0e9fd586"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.