GHSA-CJ4C-7QCH-H3MH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:02 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:02
VLAI
Details

process_certificate in tls1.c in Cameron Hamilton-Rich axTLS through 2.1.5 has a Buffer Overflow via a crafted TLS certificate handshake message with zero certificates.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-9689"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-12-03T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "process_certificate in tls1.c in Cameron Hamilton-Rich axTLS through 2.1.5 has a Buffer Overflow via a crafted TLS certificate handshake message with zero certificates.",
  "id": "GHSA-cj4c-7qch-h3mh",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:02:38Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:02:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9689"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Nov/44"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.telekom.com/en/corporate-responsibility/data-protection-data-security/security/details/advisories-504842"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.telekom.com/resource/blob/586428/51ae062269fbcb068bd20379f87f1398/dl-191121-critical-remote-denial-of-service-vulnerability-ii--data.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://axtls.sourceforge.net"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155500/axTLS-2.1.5-Denial-Of-Service.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…