GHSA-CJ23-3RW6-M3CC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:18 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:18
VLAI
Details
Google CityHash computes hash values without properly restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table, as demonstrated by a universal multicollision attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-6051"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-11-28T13:03:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Google CityHash computes hash values without properly restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table, as demonstrated by a universal multicollision attack.",
"id": "GHSA-cj23-3rw6-m3cc",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:18:21Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:18:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-6051"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.131002.net/data/talks/appsec12_slides.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://2012.appsec-forum.ch/conferences/#c17"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://asfws12.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/asfws2012-jean_philippe_aumasson-martin_bosslet-hash_flooding_dos_reloaded.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://code.google.com/p/cityhash/source/browse/trunk/NEWS"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…