GHSA-CFHV-72P9-R3F9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:48 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:48
VLAI?
Details
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in communityplusplus/www/administrator.php in eFront Community++ edition 3.6.10, and possibly other editions, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the filter parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-1048"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-02-12T22:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in communityplusplus/www/administrator.php in eFront Community++ edition 3.6.10, and possibly other editions, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the filter parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-cfhv-72p9-r3f9",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:48:56Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:48:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1048"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/73043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-02/0033.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51894"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=423"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…