GHSA-CCM4-344C-HJV9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-28 09:31 – Updated: 2026-08-29 09:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/util: don't read __page_2 for order-1 folios in snapshot_page()

snapshot_page() currently reads __page_2 after checking nr_pages > 1, but it should only do so when nr_pages > 2.

If an order-1 folio is allocated at the end of a vmemmap section, __page_2 will not exist and reading it will cause a fault.

During DLPAR memory remove on a 22 TB ppc64le LPAR, snapshot_page() oopsed on the page isolation path while reading an order-1 folio's __page_2 from an adjacent absent section (unmapped vmemmap).

Fix this to avoid reading memmap that doesn't exist (e.g., a vmemmap hole).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-80685"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-28T08:16:53Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/util: don\u0027t read __page_2 for order-1 folios in snapshot_page()\n\nsnapshot_page() currently reads __page_2 after checking nr_pages \u003e 1, but\nit should only do so when nr_pages \u003e 2.\n\nIf an order-1 folio is allocated at the end of a vmemmap section,\n__page_2 will not exist and reading it will cause a fault.\n\nDuring DLPAR memory remove on a 22 TB ppc64le LPAR, snapshot_page() oopsed\non the page isolation path while reading an order-1 folio\u0027s __page_2 from\nan adjacent absent section (unmapped vmemmap).\n\nFix this to avoid reading memmap that doesn\u0027t exist (e.g., a vmemmap\nhole).",
  "id": "GHSA-ccm4-344c-hjv9",
  "modified": "2026-08-29T09:30:28Z",
  "published": "2026-08-28T09:31:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80685"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7441d6348c70738e9ed307510db171c7a9b3f4bf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9668ffe0e2a5e2399dce281620198a2e415871fc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c649324571206a30949765320b91ccdb4c1722dc"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…