GHSA-C8F2-2F6P-GPGC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-03 15:30 – Updated: 2025-03-17 18:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hsr: remove WARN_ONCE() in send_hsr_supervision_frame()
Syzkaller reported [1] hitting a warning after failing to allocate resources for skb in hsr_init_skb(). Since a WARN_ONCE() call will not help much in this case, it might be prudent to switch to netdev_warn_once(). At the very least it will suppress syzkaller reports such as [1].
Just in case, use netdev_warn_once() in send_prp_supervision_frame() for similar reasons.
[1] HSR: Could not send supervision frame WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 85 at net/hsr/hsr_device.c:294 send_hsr_supervision_frame+0x60a/0x810 net/hsr/hsr_device.c:294 RIP: 0010:send_hsr_supervision_frame+0x60a/0x810 net/hsr/hsr_device.c:294 ... Call Trace: hsr_announce+0x114/0x370 net/hsr/hsr_device.c:382 call_timer_fn+0x193/0x590 kernel/time/timer.c:1700 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1751 [inline] __run_timers+0x764/0xb20 kernel/time/timer.c:2022 run_timer_softirq+0x58/0xd0 kernel/time/timer.c:2035 __do_softirq+0x21a/0x8de kernel/softirq.c:553 invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:427 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu kernel/softirq.c:632 [inline] irq_exit_rcu+0xb7/0x120 kernel/softirq.c:644 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x95/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1076 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:649 ...
This issue is also found in older kernels (at least up to 5.10).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-26707"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-03T15:15:53Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: hsr: remove WARN_ONCE() in send_hsr_supervision_frame()\n\nSyzkaller reported [1] hitting a warning after failing to allocate\nresources for skb in hsr_init_skb(). Since a WARN_ONCE() call will\nnot help much in this case, it might be prudent to switch to\nnetdev_warn_once(). At the very least it will suppress syzkaller\nreports such as [1].\n\nJust in case, use netdev_warn_once() in send_prp_supervision_frame()\nfor similar reasons.\n\n[1]\nHSR: Could not send supervision frame\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 85 at net/hsr/hsr_device.c:294 send_hsr_supervision_frame+0x60a/0x810 net/hsr/hsr_device.c:294\nRIP: 0010:send_hsr_supervision_frame+0x60a/0x810 net/hsr/hsr_device.c:294\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u003cIRQ\u003e\n hsr_announce+0x114/0x370 net/hsr/hsr_device.c:382\n call_timer_fn+0x193/0x590 kernel/time/timer.c:1700\n expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1751 [inline]\n __run_timers+0x764/0xb20 kernel/time/timer.c:2022\n run_timer_softirq+0x58/0xd0 kernel/time/timer.c:2035\n __do_softirq+0x21a/0x8de kernel/softirq.c:553\n invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:427 [inline]\n __irq_exit_rcu kernel/softirq.c:632 [inline]\n irq_exit_rcu+0xb7/0x120 kernel/softirq.c:644\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x95/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1076\n \u003c/IRQ\u003e\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:649\n...\n\nThis issue is also found in older kernels (at least up to 5.10).",
"id": "GHSA-c8f2-2f6p-gpgc",
"modified": "2025-03-17T18:31:38Z",
"published": "2024-04-03T15:30:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26707"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d8011a878fdf96123bc0d6a12e2fe7ced5fddfb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37e8c97e539015637cb920d3e6f1e404f707a06e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/547545e50c913861219947ce490c68a1776b9b51"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/56440799fc4621c279df16176f83a995d056023a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/923dea2a7ea9e1ef5ac4031fba461c1cc92e32b8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de769423b2f053182a41317c4db5a927e90622a0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00017.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.