GHSA-C5F6-CP2C-VCQC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-10-30 15:33In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: Quiesce response IRQ before freeing request queue
qla2xxx_delete_qpair() deletes the request queue before the response queue. qla25xx_delete_req_que() frees the request queue memory (kfree(req) in qla25xx_free_req_que()), but the response-queue MSI-X is only released later, in qla25xx_free_rsp_que(). In that window the response interrupt can still fire, qla2xxx_msix_rsp_q() queues qpair->q_work, and qla_do_work() -> qla24xx_process_response_queue() dereferences the now-freed rsp->req (LOGINOUT/CT/ELS entries and the status path), a use-after-free.
The cancel_work_sync() added for the qpair teardown lives in the response free path, which runs after the request queue is already freed, so it does not protect rsp->req.
Release the response-queue interrupt and flush qpair->q_work before deleting the request queue, so no late completion can reach the freed request queue. Clearing have_irq makes the subsequent qla25xx_free_rsp_que() skip its free_irq(), and the firmware queue-delete order (request then response) is preserved; the request-delete mailbox completes on the default vector and is unaffected by dropping the qpair response interrupt early.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-89848"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T11:16:52Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: qla2xxx: Quiesce response IRQ before freeing request queue\n\nqla2xxx_delete_qpair() deletes the request queue before the response\nqueue. qla25xx_delete_req_que() frees the request queue memory\n(kfree(req) in qla25xx_free_req_que()), but the response-queue MSI-X is\nonly released later, in qla25xx_free_rsp_que(). In that window the\nresponse interrupt can still fire, qla2xxx_msix_rsp_q() queues\nqpair-\u003eq_work, and qla_do_work() -\u003e qla24xx_process_response_queue()\ndereferences the now-freed rsp-\u003ereq (LOGINOUT/CT/ELS entries and the\nstatus path), a use-after-free.\n\nThe cancel_work_sync() added for the qpair teardown lives in the\nresponse free path, which runs after the request queue is already freed,\nso it does not protect rsp-\u003ereq.\n\nRelease the response-queue interrupt and flush qpair-\u003eq_work before\ndeleting the request queue, so no late completion can reach the freed\nrequest queue. Clearing have_irq makes the subsequent\nqla25xx_free_rsp_que() skip its free_irq(), and the firmware\nqueue-delete order (request then response) is preserved; the\nrequest-delete mailbox completes on the default vector and is unaffected\nby dropping the qpair response interrupt early.",
"id": "GHSA-c5f6-cp2c-vcqc",
"modified": "2026-10-30T15:33:29Z",
"published": "2026-09-16T12:30:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a005dcc5e9bf7b31a45422b10f2765b25161389"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10e9f05f7fd0a103886a867ec8afe621fe4b906a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1486cc18be3e2b4c2a730f4a1b0448d009381b3d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/157ca7d1af45f87aa14a286754f19c3f72386988"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/505753ec2594c6af09a601f0dd60be7d840c1d2d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/730a18768b27582636b5af343069c30809b763a2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ac5be2a8609679fc6bbfea881360444a5ce8202"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/be68aef64ab2e633867c4ac946d16644c306fc3d"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.