GHSA-C4MR-889M-VGF6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 20:19 – Updated: 2026-05-13 13:52
VLAI?
Summary
Wagtail has improper permission handling when viewing page history
Details

Impact

A CMS user without the ability to edit a page could still access the history report for the page, potentially resulting in disclosure of sensitive information.

Patches

Patched versions have been released as Wagtail 7.0.7 and 7.3.2. The new 7.4 LTS feature release also incorporates this fix.

Workarounds

No workaround is available.

Acknowledgements

Wagtail thanks Seoyoung Kang @seoyoung-kang who is from AhnLab and also an independent security researcher for reporting this issue.

For more information

If there are any questions or comments about this advisory:

Severity ?
4.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "wagtail"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7.0.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "wagtail"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "7.1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7.3.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44198"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-280"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-08T20:19:08Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-11T16:17:35Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nA CMS user without the ability to edit a page could still access the history report for the page, potentially resulting in disclosure of sensitive information.\n\n### Patches\nPatched versions have been released as Wagtail 7.0.7 and 7.3.2. The new 7.4 LTS feature release also incorporates this fix.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNo workaround is available.\n\n### Acknowledgements\n\nWagtail thanks Seoyoung Kang @seoyoung-kang who is from AhnLab and also an independent security researcher for reporting this issue.\n\n### For more information\nIf there are any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Visit Wagtail\u0027s [support channels](https://docs.wagtail.org/en/stable/support.html)\n* Send an email to [security@wagtail.org](mailto:security@wagtail.org) (view the [security policy](https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/security/policy) for more information).",
  "id": "GHSA-c4mr-889m-vgf6",
  "modified": "2026-05-13T13:52:50Z",
  "published": "2026-05-08T20:19:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/security/advisories/GHSA-c4mr-889m-vgf6"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44198"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Wagtail has improper permission handling when viewing page history"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.