GHSA-9XCP-X784-H228
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-17 21:32 – Updated: 2025-06-17 21:32A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (SaaS) could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations.
Please note: this vulnerability only affects the SaaS instance of Apex Central - customers that automatically apply Trend Micro's monthly maintenance releases to the SaaS instance do not have to take any further action.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30680"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-17T20:15:31Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (SaaS) could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations. \n\nPlease note: this vulnerability only affects the SaaS instance of Apex Central - customers that automatically apply Trend Micro\u0027s monthly maintenance releases to the SaaS instance do not have to take any further action.",
"id": "GHSA-9xcp-x784-h228",
"modified": "2025-06-17T21:32:31Z",
"published": "2025-06-17T21:32:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30680"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://success.trendmicro.com/en-US/solution/KA-0019355"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-25-238"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.