GHSA-9X4Q-MQV8-F9QG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:22 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:22
VLAI?
Details

Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 2.0.1 leaks sensitive information during boot-up, which allows attackers to obtain the MD5 hash of the Admin password, MD5 hash of the physical password, and other registration information.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-1934"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 2.0.1 leaks sensitive information during boot-up, which allows attackers to obtain the MD5 hash of the Admin password, MD5 hash of the physical password, and other registration information.",
  "id": "GHSA-9x4q-mqv8-f9qg",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:22:11Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:22:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1934"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/288383"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/9948.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5534"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.sys-security.com/archive/advisories/More_Vulnerabilities_with_Pingtel_xpressa_SIP-based_IP_phones.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…