GHSA-9WXH-35JP-39HR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:02 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:02
VLAI
Details

Unknown vulnerability in apt-cacher in Debian 3.1, related to "missing input sanitising," allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the caching server.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-1854"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-08-05T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Unknown vulnerability in apt-cacher in Debian 3.1, related to \"missing input sanitising,\" allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the caching server.",
  "id": "GHSA-9wxh-35jp-39hr",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T02:02:43Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:02:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1854"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/21664"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16327"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-772"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14459"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…