GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-9W9R-VQ29-W437

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-31 12:33 – Updated: 2025-02-04 18:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

vsock/bpf: return early if transport is not assigned

Some of the core functions can only be called if the transport has been assigned.

As Michal reported, a socket might have the transport at NULL, for example after a failed connect(), causing the following trace:

BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a0
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 12faf8067 P4D 12faf8067 PUD 113670067 PMD 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 15 UID: 0 PID: 1198 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2+
RIP: 0010:vsock_connectible_has_data+0x1f/0x40
Call Trace:
 vsock_bpf_recvmsg+0xca/0x5e0
 sock_recvmsg+0xb9/0xc0
 __sys_recvfrom+0xb3/0x130
 __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x20/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

So we need to check the vsk->transport in vsock_bpf_recvmsg(), especially for connected sockets (stream/seqpacket) as we already do in __vsock_connectible_recvmsg().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-21670"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-31T12:15:28Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvsock/bpf: return early if transport is not assigned\n\nSome of the core functions can only be called if the transport\nhas been assigned.\n\nAs Michal reported, a socket might have the transport at NULL,\nfor example after a failed connect(), causing the following trace:\n\n    BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a0\n    #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n    #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n    PGD 12faf8067 P4D 12faf8067 PUD 113670067 PMD 0\n    Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n    CPU: 15 UID: 0 PID: 1198 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2+\n    RIP: 0010:vsock_connectible_has_data+0x1f/0x40\n    Call Trace:\n     vsock_bpf_recvmsg+0xca/0x5e0\n     sock_recvmsg+0xb9/0xc0\n     __sys_recvfrom+0xb3/0x130\n     __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x20/0x30\n     do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180\n     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n\nSo we need to check the `vsk-\u003etransport` in vsock_bpf_recvmsg(),\nespecially for connected sockets (stream/seqpacket) as we already\ndo in __vsock_connectible_recvmsg().",
  "id": "GHSA-9w9r-vq29-w437",
  "modified": "2025-02-04T18:30:47Z",
  "published": "2025-01-31T12:33:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21670"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58e586c30d0b6f5dc0174a41026f2b0a48c9aab6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6771e1279dadf1d92a72e1465134257d9e6f2459"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6abafcd32f9cfc4b1a2f820ecea70773e26d423"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…