GHSA-9QPJ-2QWQ-5F72
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:52 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:52The client in Jetro COCKPIT Secure Browsing (JCSB) 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 does not validate the FileName element in an RDP_FILE_TRANSFER document, which allows remote JCSB servers to execute arbitrary programs by providing a .EXE extension.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-1861"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-02-18T11:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The client in Jetro COCKPIT Secure Browsing (JCSB) 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 does not validate the FileName element in an RDP_FILE_TRANSFER document, which allows remote JCSB servers to execute arbitrary programs by providing a .EXE extension.",
"id": "GHSA-9qpj-2qwq-5f72",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:52:37Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:52:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-1861"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-02/0075.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://blog.quaji.com/2014/02/remote-code-execution-on-all-enterprise.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.