GHSA-9FRM-MF75-F6Q2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:31 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:31
VLAI
Details
Unspecified vulnerability in the XML Digital Signature verification functionality in JVA-RUN in JDK 6.0 in IBM OS/400 i5/OS V5R4M0 and V6R1M0 has unknown impact and attack vectors related to "XML SECURITY PATCH."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-2030"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-06-11T21:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Unspecified vulnerability in the XML Digital Signature verification functionality in JVA-RUN in JDK 6.0 in IBM OS/400 i5/OS V5R4M0 and V6R1M0 has unknown impact and attack vectors related to \"XML SECURITY PATCH.\"",
"id": "GHSA-9frm-mf75-f6q2",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:31:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:31:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2030"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/51005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35356"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas2741c96b7c573b81a862575cc003c726e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas2e858199605d67111862575cc003c7276"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2009-June/002190.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35265"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1536"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…