GHSA-9FQF-4MVH-6FX9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/rmap: initialize nr_pages to 1 at loop start in try_to_unmap_one

Initialize nr_pages to 1 at the start of each loop iteration, like folio_referenced_one() does.

Without this, nr_pages computed by a previous folio_unmap_pte_batch() call can be reused on a later iteration that does not run folio_unmap_pte_batch() again.

mmap a 64K large folio with MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_DROPPABLE, then call madvise(MADV_FREE), then make the last page device-exclusive via HMM_DMIRROR_EXCLUSIVE.

Trigger node reclaim through sysfs. Now, in try_to_unmap_one(), we will first clear the first 15 out of 16 entries mapping the lazyfree folio. This will set nr_pages to 15. In the next pvmw walk, this nr_pages gets reused on a device-exclusive pte, thus potentially corrupting folio refcount/mapcount.

At the moment, I have a userspace program which can make the kernel spit out a trace, but the blow up is in folio_referenced_one(), because there are existing bugs in the interaction between device-private and rmap (which too I am investigating). I did a one liner kernel change to avoid going into folio_referenced_one(), and the kernel blows up at folio_remove_rmap_ptes in try_to_unmap_one which is what I wanted.

Note that the bug is there not since file folio batching but lazyfree folio batching, since device-exclusive only works for anonymous folios.

Userspace visible effect is simply kernel crashing somewhere due to refcount/mapcount corruption.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-63950"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:13Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/rmap: initialize nr_pages to 1 at loop start in try_to_unmap_one\n\nInitialize nr_pages to 1 at the start of each loop iteration, like\nfolio_referenced_one() does.\n\nWithout this, nr_pages computed by a previous folio_unmap_pte_batch() call\ncan be reused on a later iteration that does not run\nfolio_unmap_pte_batch() again.\n\nmmap a 64K large folio with MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_DROPPABLE, then call\nmadvise(MADV_FREE), then make the last page device-exclusive via\nHMM_DMIRROR_EXCLUSIVE.\n\nTrigger node reclaim through sysfs.  Now, in try_to_unmap_one(), we will\nfirst clear the first 15 out of 16 entries mapping the lazyfree folio. \nThis will set nr_pages to 15.  In the next pvmw walk, this nr_pages gets\nreused on a device-exclusive pte, thus potentially corrupting folio\nrefcount/mapcount.\n\nAt the moment, I have a userspace program which can make the kernel spit\nout a trace, but the blow up is in folio_referenced_one(), because there\nare existing bugs in the interaction between device-private and rmap\n(which too I am investigating).  I did a one liner kernel change to avoid\ngoing into folio_referenced_one(), and the kernel blows up at\nfolio_remove_rmap_ptes in try_to_unmap_one which is what I wanted.\n\nNote that the bug is there not since file folio batching but lazyfree\nfolio batching, since device-exclusive only works for anonymous folios.\n\nUserspace visible effect is simply kernel crashing somewhere due to\nrefcount/mapcount corruption.",
  "id": "GHSA-9fqf-4mvh-6fx9",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T15:31:53Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T18:31:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63950"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0fcc34d0d8fefca4fea349e45c10e3a3d90350eb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3f8968e9cbf95d5d87d32218906cab0b9b9eddbe"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f611db9b771b2b6775357555d2517af044fca4f0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…