GHSA-9F67-CGCG-C6VJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:48 – Updated: 2022-05-24 16:48
VLAI
Details
A heap-based buffer overflow in cosa_dhcpv4_dml.c in the RDK RDKB-20181217-1 CcspPandM module may allow attackers with login credentials to achieve remote code execution by crafting a long buffer in the "Comment" field of an IP reservation form in the admin panel. This is related to the CcspCommonLibrary module.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-6963"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-06-20T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A heap-based buffer overflow in cosa_dhcpv4_dml.c in the RDK RDKB-20181217-1 CcspPandM module may allow attackers with login credentials to achieve remote code execution by crafting a long buffer in the \"Comment\" field of an IP reservation form in the admin panel. This is related to the CcspCommonLibrary module.",
"id": "GHSA-9f67-cgcg-c6vj",
"modified": "2022-05-24T16:48:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:48:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-6963"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://dojo.bullguard.com/dojo-by-bullguard/blog/the-gateway-is-wide-open"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…