GHSA-99HF-6GPM-CPHH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:59 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:59
VLAI?
Details
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index.php in Acc PHP eMail 1.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change passwords.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-4906"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-06-25T19:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index.php in Acc PHP eMail 1.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change passwords.",
"id": "GHSA-99hf-6gpm-cphh",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:59:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:59:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4906"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/0912-exploits/ape-xsrf.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37666"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10412"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3508"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…