GHSA-934W-87QH-QR26

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-16 13:49 – Updated: 2026-08-14 18:45
VLAI
Summary
Nuxt: Reflected XSS in `<NuxtLink>` via unsanitised `javascript:` or `data:` URL
Details

Summary

<NuxtLink> did not validate the URL scheme of values bound to its to or href props before rendering them into the href attribute of the underlying <a> element. When an application binds attacker-controlled input (a query parameter, a CMS field, a user-supplied profile URL) to <NuxtLink :to> or :href, the attacker can supply a javascript: or vbscript: URL that is reflected verbatim into the rendered markup. Clicking the link executes the supplied script in the origin of the Nuxt application, resulting in reflected DOM-based cross-site scripting. A data:text/html,... payload reflected through the same sink does not execute in the application's origin but enables a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link.

The same value was exposed to consumers of the component's custom slot via the href and route.href props, so applications that re-bind those values to their own anchors were affected identically.

Unlike the previously reported navigateTo issue (CVE-2024-34343), the sink here is the rendered anchor itself; the existing isScriptProtocol checks in navigateTo and reloadNuxtApp are not on the code path. The onClick handler intentionally returns early for external links so the browser's native protocol-based navigation runs.

Affected component

  • File: packages/nuxt/src/app/components/nuxt-link.ts
  • Sink: h('a', { href: href.value, ... }) in the default render, plus the href / route.href props passed to the custom slot.
  • Broken check: external auto-detection treated any hasProtocol(path, { acceptRelative: true }) value as an "external link", then rendered the value directly as <a href> without rejecting script-capable protocols. There was no equivalent of the navigateTo isScriptProtocol(protocol) gate in this path.

Impact

Any Nuxt application that binds user-controlled values to <NuxtLink :to> / :href was vulnerable. Common shapes: profile-link rendering (<NuxtLink :to="user.website">), "share this" / "open in new tab" handlers that pass through a query parameter, CMS-driven landing pages that render <NuxtLink :to="cms.cta.url">, and marketplace listings that show seller-supplied links.

For javascript: / vbscript: the primitive is reflected XSS in the application's first-party origin (session theft for non-HttpOnly cookies, CSRF token theft, account takeover via DOM rewriting, credential harvesting via fake login overlays). For data:text/html,... the attacker gets a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link.

Patches

Fixed in nuxt@4.4.7 (commit 0103ce06) and backported to nuxt@3.21.7 (commit 53284043). The fix sanitises the resolved external href before it is passed to <a> or the custom slot: control characters and whitespace are stripped, leading view-source: prefixes are unwrapped, and any remaining script-capable scheme (per isScriptProtocol) causes the href to be replaced with an empty string.

Workarounds

Until you can upgrade, validate URLs at the source before binding them to <NuxtLink :to> / :href. For example, only accept paths that start with / (and not //), or run user-supplied URLs through new URL(value) and reject anything whose protocol is not in an allow-list (typically http: and https:).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "nuxt"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.4.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "nuxt"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.21.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53722"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79",
      "CWE-83"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-16T13:49:36Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-12T15:16:31Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n`\u003cNuxtLink\u003e` did not validate the URL scheme of values bound to its `to` or `href` props before rendering them into the `href` attribute of the underlying `\u003ca\u003e` element. When an application binds attacker-controlled input (a query parameter, a CMS field, a user-supplied profile URL) to `\u003cNuxtLink :to\u003e` or `:href`, the attacker can supply a `javascript:` or `vbscript:` URL that is reflected verbatim into the rendered markup. Clicking the link executes the supplied script in the origin of the Nuxt application, resulting in reflected DOM-based cross-site scripting. A `data:text/html,...` payload reflected through the same sink does not execute in the application\u0027s origin but enables a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link.\n\nThe same value was exposed to consumers of the component\u0027s `custom` slot via the `href` and `route.href` props, so applications that re-bind those values to their own anchors were affected identically.\n\nUnlike the previously reported `navigateTo` issue (CVE-2024-34343), the sink here is the rendered anchor itself; the existing `isScriptProtocol` checks in `navigateTo` and `reloadNuxtApp` are not on the code path. The `onClick` handler intentionally returns early for external links so the browser\u0027s native protocol-based navigation runs.\n\n### Affected component\n\n- File: `packages/nuxt/src/app/components/nuxt-link.ts`\n- Sink: `h(\u0027a\u0027, { href: href.value, ... })` in the default render, plus the `href` / `route.href` props passed to the `custom` slot.\n- Broken check: external auto-detection treated any `hasProtocol(path, { acceptRelative: true })` value as an \"external link\", then rendered the value directly as `\u003ca href\u003e` without rejecting script-capable protocols. There was no equivalent of the `navigateTo` `isScriptProtocol(protocol)` gate in this path.\n\n### Impact\n\nAny Nuxt application that binds user-controlled values to `\u003cNuxtLink :to\u003e` / `:href` was vulnerable. Common shapes: profile-link rendering (`\u003cNuxtLink :to=\"user.website\"\u003e`), \"share this\" / \"open in new tab\" handlers that pass through a query parameter, CMS-driven landing pages that render `\u003cNuxtLink :to=\"cms.cta.url\"\u003e`, and marketplace listings that show seller-supplied links.\n\nFor `javascript:` / `vbscript:` the primitive is reflected XSS in the application\u0027s first-party origin (session theft for non-`HttpOnly` cookies, CSRF token theft, account takeover via DOM rewriting, credential harvesting via fake login overlays). For `data:text/html,...` the attacker gets a same-tab phishing surface anchored to a legitimate application link.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in `nuxt@4.4.7` (commit [`0103ce06`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/0103ce06fbbbdfa079a7f020ef8ce00121eac4a3)) and backported to `nuxt@3.21.7` (commit [`53284043`](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/53284043dc21210a25d629d1cec67d3ae557ffd0)). The fix sanitises the resolved external `href` before it is passed to `\u003ca\u003e` or the `custom` slot: control characters and whitespace are stripped, leading `view-source:` prefixes are unwrapped, and any remaining script-capable scheme (per `isScriptProtocol`) causes the `href` to be replaced with an empty string.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nUntil you can upgrade, validate URLs at the source before binding them to `\u003cNuxtLink :to\u003e` / `:href`. For example, only accept paths that start with `/` (and not `//`), or run user-supplied URLs through `new URL(value)` and reject anything whose `protocol` is not in an allow-list (typically `http:` and `https:`).",
  "id": "GHSA-934w-87qh-qr26",
  "modified": "2026-08-14T18:45:56Z",
  "published": "2026-06-16T13:49:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/security/advisories/GHSA-934w-87qh-qr26"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53722"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/0103ce06fbbbdfa079a7f020ef8ce00121eac4a3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/53284043dc21210a25d629d1cec67d3ae557ffd0"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Nuxt: Reflected XSS in `\u003cNuxtLink\u003e` via unsanitised `javascript:` or `data:` URL"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…