GHSA-8VVP-6P8Q-Q9PQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-24 18:31 – Updated: 2026-09-25 06:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: tree-checker: validate names in ROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF
ROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF items contain a struct btrfs_root_ref followed by the subvolume name. Several readers assume that this layout is already valid and then use the on-disk name length directly. A corrupted item can therefore make those readers address bytes outside the item, and BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO can copy too many bytes into its fixed-size UAPI name buffer.
Validate ROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF items in tree-checker before any reader uses them. Reject records that do not contain a non-empty name, whose name_len does not exactly describe the remaining item payload, or whose name exceeds BTRFS_NAME_LEN.
For BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO, copy only the validated on-disk name_len instead of deriving the copy length from the item size. The ioctl result is zeroed when allocated. That leaves the existing trailing zero byte untouched.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-97415"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-24T17:17:19Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: tree-checker: validate names in ROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF\n\nROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF items contain a struct btrfs_root_ref followed\nby the subvolume name. Several readers assume that this layout is already\nvalid and then use the on-disk name length directly. A corrupted item can\ntherefore make those readers address bytes outside the item, and\nBTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO can copy too many bytes into its fixed-size UAPI\nname buffer.\n\nValidate ROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF items in tree-checker before any reader\nuses them. Reject records that do not contain a non-empty name, whose\nname_len does not exactly describe the remaining item payload, or whose\nname exceeds BTRFS_NAME_LEN.\n\nFor BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO, copy only the validated on-disk name_len\ninstead of deriving the copy length from the item size. The ioctl result is\nzeroed when allocated. That leaves the existing trailing zero byte\nuntouched.",
"id": "GHSA-8vvp-6p8q-q9pq",
"modified": "2026-09-25T06:30:31Z",
"published": "2026-09-24T18:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97415"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0af37c217edf15fa21dac1c40822086df356c6bb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/74f577c722c99248d804eca18e7de7c5e47549d7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9154542070ca7eadb3c764a882f39a127677854b"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.