GHSA-8VVP-6P8Q-Q9PQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-24 18:31 – Updated: 2026-10-03 12:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: tree-checker: validate names in ROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF

ROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF items contain a struct btrfs_root_ref followed by the subvolume name. Several readers assume that this layout is already valid and then use the on-disk name length directly. A corrupted item can therefore make those readers address bytes outside the item, and BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO can copy too many bytes into its fixed-size UAPI name buffer.

Validate ROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF items in tree-checker before any reader uses them. Reject records that do not contain a non-empty name, whose name_len does not exactly describe the remaining item payload, or whose name exceeds BTRFS_NAME_LEN.

For BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO, copy only the validated on-disk name_len instead of deriving the copy length from the item size. The ioctl result is zeroed when allocated. That leaves the existing trailing zero byte untouched.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-97415"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-24T17:17:19Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: tree-checker: validate names in ROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF\n\nROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF items contain a struct btrfs_root_ref followed\nby the subvolume name. Several readers assume that this layout is already\nvalid and then use the on-disk name length directly. A corrupted item can\ntherefore make those readers address bytes outside the item, and\nBTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO can copy too many bytes into its fixed-size UAPI\nname buffer.\n\nValidate ROOT_REF and ROOT_BACKREF items in tree-checker before any reader\nuses them. Reject records that do not contain a non-empty name, whose\nname_len does not exactly describe the remaining item payload, or whose\nname exceeds BTRFS_NAME_LEN.\n\nFor BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO, copy only the validated on-disk name_len\ninstead of deriving the copy length from the item size. The ioctl result is\nzeroed when allocated. That leaves the existing trailing zero byte\nuntouched.",
  "id": "GHSA-8vvp-6p8q-q9pq",
  "modified": "2026-10-03T12:31:11Z",
  "published": "2026-09-24T18:31:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97415"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0af37c217edf15fa21dac1c40822086df356c6bb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1370badf6b823ce3cde39a65f46f9e5dc7b4bf43"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/74f577c722c99248d804eca18e7de7c5e47549d7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9154542070ca7eadb3c764a882f39a127677854b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba6c4fc662853f6662e4db060cf88ee994053e21"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.