GHSA-8MGM-62QJ-RH6H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-09 12:30 – Updated: 2026-07-09 12:30
VLAI
Details

The Blocks for ACF Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the get_all_values() function in the /wp-json/acf-field-blocks/v1/values REST endpoint in versions up to, and including, 1.6.2. The permission_callback only verifies the generic publish_posts capability and the handler passes a user-supplied id parameter directly to get_field_objects() without verifying that the requesting user is authorized to read the target object. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to read ACF field values from arbitrary posts (including private posts, drafts, posts by other users, and other ACF-supported objects) that they should not have access to.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-12428"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-09T11:16:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Blocks for ACF Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the get_all_values() function in the /wp-json/acf-field-blocks/v1/values REST endpoint in versions up to, and including, 1.6.2. The permission_callback only verifies the generic publish_posts capability and the handler passes a user-supplied id parameter directly to get_field_objects() without verifying that the requesting user is authorized to read the target object. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to read ACF field values from arbitrary posts (including private posts, drafts, posts by other users, and other ACF-supported objects) that they should not have access to.",
  "id": "GHSA-8mgm-62qj-rh6h",
  "modified": "2026-07-09T12:30:28Z",
  "published": "2026-07-09T12:30:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12428"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acf-field-blocks/tags/1.5.0/inc/class-rest.php#L100"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acf-field-blocks/tags/1.5.0/inc/class-rest.php#L296"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acf-field-blocks/tags/1.5.0/inc/class-rest.php#L302"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acf-field-blocks/tags/1.6.0/inc/class-rest.php#L100"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acf-field-blocks/tags/1.6.0/inc/class-rest.php#L296"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acf-field-blocks/tags/1.6.0/inc/class-rest.php#L302"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?reponame=\u0026old=3587876%40acf-field-blocks\u0026new=3587876%40acf-field-blocks"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/fc48f75d-a2e8-49ea-9bfa-a27a61ff8a84?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…