GHSA-8JG9-F732-244H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-06 09:31 – Updated: 2026-10-06 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KEYS: encrypted: fix integer overflow of datablob_len

encrypted_key_alloc() stores datablob_len in a u16. It is computed from multiple string and payload lengths. If the result exceeds U16_MAX, the assignment truncates the allocation size. KASAN reports a 32760-byte slab-out-of-bounds write when __ekey_init() copies the master key description into the undersized buffer.

The total payload length stored in key->datalen is also a u16. Use check_add_overflow() to reject values that do not fit either destination, and use kzalloc_flex() for the flexible-array allocation.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-98222"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-06T09:18:09Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKEYS: encrypted: fix integer overflow of datablob_len\n\nencrypted_key_alloc() stores datablob_len in a u16. It is computed from\nmultiple string and payload lengths. If the result exceeds U16_MAX, the\nassignment truncates the allocation size. KASAN reports a 32760-byte\nslab-out-of-bounds write when __ekey_init() copies the master key\ndescription into the undersized buffer.\n\nThe total payload length stored in key-\u003edatalen is also a u16. Use\ncheck_add_overflow() to reject values that do not fit either destination,\nand use kzalloc_flex() for the flexible-array allocation.",
  "id": "GHSA-8jg9-f732-244h",
  "modified": "2026-10-06T09:31:31Z",
  "published": "2026-10-06T09:31:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98222"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e720f63dbafc093a8f5d519f05b67724993edd4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8697c431e297eb0d0ab13dda6bc172b48a34f05c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a98eca102b1cbbc37ff9eaa197ae4e6a3ea4b0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cca38f2102a4cd35eda8d48950df4817b4b24757"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.