GHSA-8H6V-VG4C-567J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:10 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:16
VLAI?
Details

Behavioral discrepancy information leak in Juniper Netscreen VPN running ScreenOS 5.2.0 and earlier, when using IKE with pre-shared key authentication, allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via an IKE Aggressive Mode packet, which generates a response if the username is valid but does not respond when the username is invalid.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-2640"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-08-23T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Behavioral discrepancy information leak in Juniper Netscreen VPN running ScreenOS 5.2.0 and earlier, when using IKE with pre-shared key authentication, allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via an IKE Aggressive Mode packet, which generates a response if the username is valid but does not respond when the username is invalid.",
  "id": "GHSA-8h6v-vg4c-567j",
  "modified": "2025-04-03T04:16:39Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:10:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2640"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112438068426034\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16474"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1014728"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/vpn-flaws/juniper/netscreen/index.htm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14595"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…